My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006_0327_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2006
>
2006_0327_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 12:23:30 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 3:33:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
222
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Thursday, March 23, 2006 <br />City Council, <br />If you want us to review our permit fees for driveways, we will <br />certainly do that. <br />In the meantime, just a few quick observations about Mr. <br />Goodmanson's letter: <br />L We try to set fees to recover costs. That way, taxpayers don't <br />subsidize these costs. <br />2. Without studying the issue further, we don't know if the <br />driveway permit fees charged in these other cities cover their <br />costs. (Sometimes, cities don't update their fees to keep up <br />with inflation in costs.) <br />3. Without studying the issue further, we don't know if there are <br />examples of other cities that charge the same or more than <br />Roseville for driveway permits. <br />4. The cities which don't require a driveway permit and, hence, <br />don't charge any fee are also not inspecting driveway <br />installations. We could do that too, but it may create another <br />set of complaints for you to handle when driveways are not <br />installed in the right place or they are too wide. <br />Neal <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.