My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006_0327_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2006
>
2006_0327_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 12:23:30 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 3:33:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
222
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Study Session — 03120106 <br />DRAFT Minutes - Page 20 <br />information from staff on a potential combination of the <br />traditional and outcome budgeting processes; and staff <br />suggestions for implementation. <br />Councilmember Kough was leaning toward a more traditional <br />budgeting process, with department accountability for their <br />specific programs and services. <br />— Councilmember Maschka expressed interest in the budgeting for <br />_ outcomes budgeting process, but questioned staff on the <br />— implications for enterprise funds and the City's Information <br />Technology (IT) enterprise. <br />Mr. Miller noted that the Council could identify those programs <br />that were revenue generating or paid for themselves completely; <br />with some lending themselves well to the process and others <br />proving more challenging. <br />Further discussion included managing IT services against <br />whether or not to keep a swimming pool open at a City park and <br />how to manage those financial outcomes; prioritizing community <br />values with operations that are self-sustaining and those that are <br />not, but still a valuable community service. <br />Councilmember Maschka supported a hybrid between the <br />traditional budgeting process and the outcome budgeting process. <br />Staff was directed, with apparent consensus, to provide <br />additional information on how to incorporate the traditional and <br />outcome-based process, for a"hybrid" process by initiating some <br />outcome-based within the traditional budget framework, with the <br />eventual goal for implementation of the outcome-based <br />budgeting process. <br />City Manager Beets noted that the City Council needed to <br />provide staff with their intent for strategic planning andlor <br />community visioning to incorporate the two processes. <br />Councilmember Pust expressed interest in, and requested <br />additional information from staff, on how a phase-in process <br />would work; and sought additional staff suggestions for <br />� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.