My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006_0410_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2006
>
2006_0410_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 1:02:16 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 3:33:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
211
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Margaret Driscoll <br />From: Amy Ihian jarr�y@briallaw.corn� <br />Sent: Monday, April 03,20062;26 PM <br />To: Nea1 Beets <br />Cc: *RVCouttcilF jts@ratwiklaw.com <br />SubjeCt: Liquor Citation ISSUeS on April 10 agenda <br />Dear Neal and Council, <br />I want Io confirm that the €�iqt€or Citation issue will be on the agenda for April 10, as Mayor Klausing indicated last meeting, <br />and to subltlit my questions again for legal opinions. <br />My ptair� concern at this point is that our ordinance (Roseville Code 302.15) has not been followed or enforced. I would like <br />to focus first on the council's power and responsibility to impose the mandatory minimum penalties under the ordinance 1 <br />propose that the council should hold a public hearing and consider whether there is any basis for deviating from the penalties <br />required under 302.15. 1 would appreciate any advice the ciry attorney has on how to do this. <br />I would also like to request legal analysis on whether the ciry council is required to hold a public hearing to temporarily <br />suspend a liquor license, or whether it would be possible to simply impose the mandatory minimum penalties in the <br />ordinance without any council involvement, with any appeals going to cou�-t. <br />J believe all of these are public policy issues that must be discussed at an open public meeting. But I would support an <br />executive session if needed on other issues, to tnake sure all council members' questions and concerns get addressed. <br />Thanks, <br />:1.i7•. <br />----0riginal Message----- <br />From: Amy Ihl�n <br />Sent: Mon 3/20/2at36 12:44 PM <br />To: Neal Beets (Nea[.Beets@ci.roseville.mn.us) <br />Cc: anargaret.d��iscol3 cr ci.roseville.inn.us;'city.council r�ci.�•ose�ille.�nn,�s' <br />Subject: Request for addition of Liquor Citation Appeal Issues on April 10 agenda <br />Dear Council, <br />1 asked Jay Squiers for an update on the criminal co�nplaint re: the liquor citation appeals. He says that tile Maple Grove city <br />attorney has decided not to ►nove forward tis i[il the complaint, and that it is now appropriate for the council to take up these <br />issues again. Since Jay indicates that neither he nor Scott Anderson will be available for tl�e March 27 meeting, I request tE1at <br />this be added as an item on our April 10 agenda. At a��it�it�u�n I would like to take up the questions I raised in my �netna of <br />January 23 (attached and pasted below) -- and will sub€�iG any addtional questions to the city attorney in advance of the April <br />10 meeting. <br />Thanks, <br />:1!I l �• <br />Liquor Citation Appeals <br />I would like to request the following information, and request that this liquor appeals issue be put on the agenda again at a <br />future meeting after the information is available: <br />1. Could the council please have a copy of the for�n letter sent to licensees informing the�n of their right to appeal to the <br />city manager? <br />2. What authority is there in city ordinances for appealing liquor citations to the city manager? <br />3. If the answer to this question is "none", the council should schedule public hearings on the penalties under °�-.1 �•; �'�. <br />�� �?� l�f�� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.