My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006_0417_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2006
>
2006_0417_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2014 1:13:37 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 3:33:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
���� � <br />4r <br />��r <br />Council Memo <br />To: City Council <br />From: Neal Beets �r���+ <br />Date: Thursday, Apri113,2006 <br />Re: Agenda item S.a. <br />Pm not sure what information the sponsor of this agenda item may have, but <br />here are two pieces � information that may be relevant for Council's <br />consideration. <br />l. You will remember that at your February 27,2006 Council Meeting, the <br />staff and city attorney recommended the Council codify Council <br />Resolution 6946. That Resolution (adopted in 1980) delegates certain <br />decisions about street signs to a Traffic Safety Committee consisting of the <br />Police Chief, the City Manager, and the Public Works Director. On <br />February 27,2006, the Council approved a motion sending this issue to the <br />Public Works, Environment, and Transportation Commission for study <br />and a recommendation. On March 28,2006 PWET recommended that the <br />Council codify Council Resolution 6946. PWET did not recommend <br />changing the composition or role of the Traffic Safety Committee. <br />Thus, Staff anticipates putting this ordinance on your Apri124 agenda <br />for enactment. <br />2. No staff inember in Public Works, Community Development, or the Police <br />Department have been contacted about this parking situation at Lexington <br />and Laurie Road. ff it is Council's wish for staff to check into this, we will <br />do so. That is what we would do in the normal course of events. Because <br />this item was placed on a Council agenda for policy discussion, and not <br />sent to staff for action, we have not attempted to contact these residents. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.