My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006_0417_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2006
>
2006_0417_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2014 1:13:37 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 3:33:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Regular Meeting — 03/27/06 <br />Minutes - Page 21 <br />Councilmember Maschka opined that the proposed resolution <br />didn't prevent the process as currently followed for normal <br />items; but noted the frustration he found in several items added <br />to an agenda, without time for staff or Council consideration of <br />research, with it then appearing on a future agenda after that <br />research had been done. <br />Councilmember Kough suggested changing Council meetings to <br />Tuesday evenings, allowing an additional day for review of <br />material. <br />Mayor Klausing noted tonight's Council Agenda Iteln #14 <br />entitled, "Discuss Permit Fees for Residential Driveways," as <br />requested by Councilmember Kough; and the staff observations <br />regarding the request. Mayor Klausing opined that, while Mr. <br />Goodmanson had a legitimate issue for Council consideration, a <br />more effective process would have been to seek additional <br />information and rationale from staff as to the City's current <br />practice and policy; allowing the City Council to make more <br />informed and better decisions. <br />Councilmember Ihlan expressed concern that this new policy <br />would allow a majority of the City Council to remove future <br />agenda items in advance and could effectively block a minority <br />Council from future discussion. Councilmember Ihlan opined <br />that this wasn't a workload issue, but a basic matter of <br />democracy; and could diminish the Councilmembers from being <br />effective advocates for citizens. <br />Mayor Klausing, as a point of information, noted that the second <br />paragraph in the resolution language regarding subsequent <br />agenda meetings spoke specifically to that issue. <br />Councilmember Ihlan sought additional clarification of the <br />language. <br />Ihlan offered a friendly amendment to the language of the second <br />paragraph to note that future Council Agenda Items would be <br />included under future City Council Agenda for notice purposes <br />only, not for removal. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.