My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006_0417_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2006
>
2006_0417_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2014 1:13:37 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 3:33:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL DISCUSSION <br />DATE: 04/17/06 <br />I'I'�M NO: 6. <br />Department Approval: �,i r•,• �i:���,� i�t i:1 ���7 � t7��t: Agenda Section: <br />TP/DPW � -- ; ��� �.t - . + . - .� <br />Item Description: Discussion of comprehensive amendments to Chapter 1009 (Sign <br />Regulations) of the Roseville City Code (PF3G28). <br />1.0 BACKGROUND: <br />Over the past year the Planning Commission and Planning Staff has been discussing and <br />creating proposed changes to Section 1009 Sign Regulations. Former Commissioner Pust <br />took the lead on behalf of the Commission and assembled a draft ordinance that included <br />a number of the itemslcharacteri�ties that the Commission supported. This draft became <br />the framework (starting point) for public hearings and Commissian <br />discussion/�odi�'icatian. <br />Examples ofthe new document and the illustrations will be shown at the meeting. <br />Since the initial public hearing in December 2005, the draft ordinance has seen a number <br />of iterations, with the focus on clarity and creativity. Specific areas of focus have <br />included the definitions section, where numerous changes have been proposed. These <br />include text modifications to clear-up existing ambiguity and the insertion of diagrams to <br />assist individuals understanding the different types of signs. Members Bak�man and <br />Boerigter have been instrumental in assisting the City Planner with the revisions <br />necessary to address the direction suggested by the Commission. <br />The Commission has also focused on creative signage through a master sign plan and <br />creating a understandable chart that provides individuals with the specifics of what type <br />of signage is allowed, where it can be placed, how large can it be, and what is the <br />maximum height. <br />2.0. NEXT STEPS: <br />On May 3,2006, the Planning Commission will receive the final draft document for <br />discussion and support. It is anticipated that this document will be submitted to the <br />Council on May 24, 2006 for consideratianladoption. <br />PF3G28_RCD_0417Q6.doc Page 1 of 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.