2006_0424_Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

handled before the Council decided in the 1980's to make that position a full-time city position.) 4. Personally, I take issue with the notion that the most appropriate time to address positions is when someone leaves. Don't wait to improve. I believe all of us - elected officials and appointed - owe our first duty to our citizens and not to individual city employees. In other words, if you or I felt the citizens of Roseville would be better served by a different organization structure that results in employees performing different duties and receiving different pay, then I believe we ought to make that change for the good of the city even if it has an adverse effect on certain city employees. City employees serve the city, not the other way around. _�. But with respect to the Community Development Department, we did make substantial changes to that Department just last Fall during our annual budget process. During that budget process Staff presented and the Council agreed as follows: elimination of a Department Assistant position in the Community Development Department (which the Council agreed to though there was an employee in that position) and the down- sizing of the �� and Economic Development Director positions to more entry-level positions with reduced responsibilities, authority, and pay. The net result was budget savings AND approximately the same level of service assuming we could hire good people (done) and provide them with good supervision (atissue). No one suggested then that we should consider changing the Community Development Manager's duties and responsibilities. If you thought such changes were appropriate that would have been the ideal time for Councilmembers to discuss even more wide- ranging changes to that Department, especially if the idea were to create a combined ACM-Community Development Manager. No one would have lost his position from that idea. 6. Moreover, there is no indication of what a Council "policy review" now of the Community Development Manager position would entail and how long it would take. The Council probably doesn't need reminding that it sometimes takes the Council many meetings over many, many months to conduct policy reviews of issues such as dangerous animals, bees and chickens, Council's own rules of operating procedure, the James Addition access, no parking signs, Fire Department response to accidents with injuries, etc. etc. This underscores my concern about an indefinite freeze on filling this significant position. 7. Finally, a small quibble with the assertion in Councilmember Ihlan's memo that a city manager needs council permission to fill existing, already-established city positions. I think that is incorrect. Once Council 2