Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Neal Beets <br />Members of the Council <br />January 9,2003 <br />Page 5 of 6 <br />Confidential: Subject to <br />Attorney-Client Privilege <br />created. Minn. Stat. � 412.681. Given that the Council has the authority to abolish offices and <br />alter the powers of the organizations it has created, it follows that the Council also has the <br />authority to abolish any positions it has created. Even if this were not the case, the Council could <br />effectively obtain the sanle result by reorganizing a department, stripping a position of its powers <br />within the department, and eliminating funding for that position. <br />"Position" Refers to a Specific Post of Employment <br />Difficult questions can arise when attempting to define the term "position" in the context of <br />the Council's authority to create positions and the Manager's authority to fill positions. For <br />example, suppose that the Council has approved the regular full-time position of "secretary" and <br />fixed the compensation for that position. Further suppose that the City currently has five <br />secretaries, but the Manager believes seven are necessary. Must the Manager get approval from <br />the Council to hire two additional secretaries? The answer depends on the manner in which the <br />term "position" is interpreted. <br />If the term "position" is interpreted to mean a specific job post, like Secretary to the Clerk, <br />then the Manager must obtain approval froln the Council to establish the position. But if the tenn <br />"position" is interpreted to mean a general job classification, like secretary, then the Manager <br />arguably has the authority to appoint persons to fill additional secretarial positions in the City. <br />Lending mild support to this latter interpretation, the RSC uses the language "position <br />classification and pay plan" in the context of the Council's authority to establish rates of pay. See <br />RSC :� 104.04(A). Despite this language, we believe the former interpretation is more in line with <br />the required budget process and the separation of powers established by the RSC and the Uniform <br />Municipal Government Act. <br />In our view, if the Manager concludes that additional secretaries are necessary to <br />effectively administer the affairs of the City, it is incumbent upon the Manager to so advise the <br />Council and provide the Council with budget estimates which include the cost of hiring the <br />additional secretaries based on their position classification and the existing pay plan established by <br />the Council. See Minn. Stat. � 412.701. Indeed, by statute, the Manager is required to submit <br />budget estimates for each department which include, as ordinary expenses, "salaries and wages, <br />with a list of all salaried offices and positions including the salary allowance and the number of <br />persons holding each." Id. Upon receiving this information from the Manager, the Council would <br />then need to decide whether to approve the positions and, if approved, would either pass a <br />resolution establishing the compensation for the positions or rely on the previously established <br />position classification and pay plan. See RSC §� 104.01(D) & l��rt . f��1 ti,� �, <br />Finally, we note that if the Council and the Manager disagree over whether the RSC gives <br />the Manager the authority to take a specific action in regard to personnel, the Manager's <br />interpretation must prevail because the RSC gives the Manager "the sole authority to interpret and <br />