Laserfiche WebLink
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION <br />DATE: 04/24/06 <br />ITEM NO: 3 , � <br />�t`I'. �:I'�' `7k'�j �:� �7 �1 �:^• �� i'.'.. �. I I 5' �'��I i�_r� I:� �7�}Cl}��i1I � ��`_t :Iti �cL �i5'.+L' �it� Il: <br />I I`; L�F��' ��-�•��� i� ��" [.s�-=-f-''l {,'�ll�� I•',\'1 <br />- � �� .---� � ..�� <br />Item Description: Request by City of Roseville, for a 60-day plan review extension (from <br />and after the end of the current period of March 20,2006 to May 18, <br />2006), regarding Cent Ventures, Inc-Livingston-Cognoscente-Extra <br />Lease application for a rezoning and a Planned Unit Development <br />related to redevelopment of property located at 2700 Cleveland <br />��3��ni��� �T'?�?1��- <br />I ,�] REQUESTED ACTION: <br />I I The City of Roseville is seeking an extension to the 60-day review deadline (from March <br />20,2006) to May 18,2006 for the application by Cent Ventures, Inc-Livingston- <br />Cognoscente-Extra Lease (the Developers) for a rezoning and a Planned Unit <br />Development related to redevelopment of property located at 2700 Cleveland Avenue. <br />�,�M BACKGROUND: <br />?. I The application was submitted to the Community Development Department on March 20, <br />2006; determined incomplete on March 30, 2006; fonvarded to applicant on March 30, <br />2006; and has a 60 day review deadline of May 18,2006. <br />�.? During the completeness review of the proposed request, the staff indicated that the <br />application was incomplete and communicated that to the Developers on March 30,2006. <br />Submission of the additional required materials will require the Developer to expend <br />additional time and consultant services and will ultimately mean that the Developer <br />cannot (in the staff opinion) submit the completed application in time for the May 3 <br />Planning Commission meeting and hearings. Additional time will be needed to review <br />this project. <br />?� Given the necessary clarifications and completions to support the Developer's request (as <br />attached in the staff communication of March 30, 2006), the staff is recommending the <br />Council approve a 60 day time extension which is allowed for under Mn. Statutes 15.99. <br />— hence an extension of the May 18,2006 review deadline by an additional 60 days. <br />�,�M SUGGESTED ACTION: <br />�. � ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING up to a 60-day extension of the Cent <br />Ventures, Inc-Livingston-Cognoscente-Extra Lease request. <br />