My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006_0508_Packet_a
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2006
>
2006_0508_Packet_a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 2:35:36 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 3:34:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
301
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Regular Meeting— 04/24/06 <br />�1RA�"'�` Minutes - Page 36 <br />Discussion included neutral funding sources; control of the <br />process; public perception; � involvement; and interpretation <br />as to the openness of the process. <br />Councilmember Maschka spoke in support of Councilmember <br />Pust's recommendation and choice of the two preferable <br />companies; noting his past experience in working with Carl Neu <br />and his management of public meetings; and spoke of the <br />approaches of the Carroll, Franck and Associates proposal for <br />getting additional public input. Councilmember Maschka <br />assured the public that this was an open process, and all would <br />be encouraged to participate. <br />Councilmember Kough spoke in support of both choices; <br />however, cautioned that it was premature to consider a consultant <br />at this time, prior to the steering committee performing their <br />work on a neutral basis. <br />Maschka moved, Pust seconded, authorization for <br />Councilmember Pust and City Manager Beets, as well as any <br />interested Councilmembers, to conduct phone interviews with <br />Carroll, Franck and Associates; and Neu and Company to verify <br />Council questions as discussed and the proposals as submitted; <br />and to determine their availability as to the proposed City <br />timeframe, as well as specific cost issues and definitions; and <br />directed the Work Group to return to the City Council with that <br />information. <br />Councilmember Ihlan noted that, in terms of the merits of the <br />proposals, she didn't disagree with tonight's discussion; but was <br />in disagreement and would be speaking against the motion due to <br />the Council needing first to identify an appropriate funding <br />source prior to making a commitment to move forward. <br />Further discussion included Mr. Neu's availability to meet <br />personally, rather than by phone; and the ��A's financial <br />commitment needing further discussion and clarification. <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Maschka; Pust and Klausing. <br />Nays: Ihlan and Kough. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.