My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006_0522_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2006
>
2006_0522_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 4:15:27 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 3:34:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
274
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Regular Meeting — OS/08/06 <br />DRAFT Minutes - Page 26 <br />and suggested that language be mirrored in this document; <br />and raised questions about organizational structure and <br />suggested an easier-to-follow document for the next <br />meeting. <br />Douglas Root, 2468 N �aaGa��i�,e <br />Mr. Root, representing the Roseville Citizen's League, <br />spolce in support of the Ethics Code as an ordinance, not a <br />resolution. <br />City Attorney Anderson clarif'ied that adoption would be <br />via ordinance for codification purposes. <br />'�. Councilmember-Initiated Items for the Council Meeting of C�unc�Imembe�- <br />May 15,2006 Initiated Items <br />1�M, Award Community Visioning Consultant Contract Award Community <br />Mayor Klausing noted that City Manager Beets, and Visioning <br />Councilmembers Pust and Ihlan had met with the two proposers Consultant <br />for more detailed information. Contract <br />Councilmember Pust, at Mayor Klausing's request, summa��zed <br />those meetings; additional information received via a <br />standardized set of questions for both parties; and the merits of <br />each party. Councilmember Pust specifically thanlced Carl Neu <br />for coming to Minnesota from Colorado at his own expense for <br />the meeting. Councilmember Pust recommended a contract with <br />Carroll, Francic & Associates; and provided a bench handout <br />further outlining the firm's proposal. <br />Councilmember Ihlan concurred that both consultants were very <br />strong applicants, brining different strengths and weaknesses to <br />the table; but again expressed her concern that the process <br />needed appropriate and identified funding and recommended <br />delaying the process until that funding source was identified, and <br />further discussion was held on maximizing citizen participation. <br />Discussion ensued regarding the aggressive time frame and <br />rationale for the timing; and necessary adjustments to the timing; <br />involvement now with school districts and affiliated <br />organizations. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.