My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006_0522_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2006
>
2006_0522_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 4:15:27 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 3:34:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
274
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Study Session — OS/15/06 <br />DRAFT Minutes - Page 13 <br />3) Schedule and conduct City Council, School Board, <br />and neighborhood meetings for the purposes of <br />presenting all applicable information related to the <br />potential construction of a community center; and <br />4) Execute the necessary legal proceedings to allow for <br />a city-wide referendum seeking approval to issue <br />general obligation bonds to finance the construction <br />of a community center. <br />Mr. Miller and staff proposed the following objectives or <br />action steps: <br />1) Establish a joint working group comprised of City <br />and School District officials for the purpose of <br />identifying tentative sties, community center needs, <br />and a general timeline; <br />2) Instruct the Roseville Community Visioning <br />steering committee to identify a subcommittee that <br />would be suitable for gauging public interest and <br />support for a community center; and <br />3) Request the steering committee and working group <br />to make a presentation before the City Council <br />regarding the level of support for a community <br />center. <br />Councilmember Pust concurred with Action Step No. 1, <br />but expressed concerns about the work group being <br />separated from the community visioning process and a <br />duplication of time and effort; opining that the <br />brainstorming sessions would be implemented soon, and a <br />subcommittee would be in process. <br />Mr. Miller noted that the proposed schedule was to <br />facilitate the School District schedule and their <br />momentum, related to a proposed �evy referendum <br />planned by the School District for this fall's election <br />process; along with the fate of the Fairview Community <br />Center and pool. <br />Councilmember Pust responded that the concerns of the <br />School District, while of interest and concern to the City, <br />was not interested in fast-tracking the discussion; and her <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.