My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006_0522_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2006
>
2006_0522_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 4:15:27 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 3:34:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
274
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Study Session— OS/15/06 <br />DRAFT Minutes - Page 19 <br />commitments the City Council may be interested in <br />to gather further input; <br />4) Revisit the current and future funding of the park <br />improvement program (PIP); <br />5) Review and update related materials (�.e., parks and <br />recreation systems plan; park improvement plan <br />[PIP]; comprehensive plan; planning and zoning <br />codes; park dedication ordinance and fees; street <br />tree master plan; etc. <br />6) Implement a neighborhood/commun�ty planning <br />process to c�eatelupdate individual park master <br />plans as well as overall system plan; <br />7) Creation of an enhanced I�orticultuare/Forest�y <br />Division; <br />8) Implement invasive plant control measures and <br />applicable funding {i.e., purple loosestrife, <br />buckthorn, etc.); <br />9) Initiate tree preservation and replanting initiatives <br />to protect and enhance Roseville trees for future <br />generations; <br />10) Review and adopt development policies related to <br />tree preservation and open space requirements in <br />the City; <br />11) Review and enact a"no net loss" policy for park <br />land, similar to Ramsey County; <br />12) Incorporate security cameras and/or emergency call <br />boxes (phones) in each new �aa�rklop�n space to <br />enhance personal security for park users. <br />Councilmember and staff discussion included tree sales <br />and fundraising potentials; research of other communities <br />and their proactive approaches to identified objectives; <br />existing park acreage of 680 acres, twice that of the <br />average community; park allocation in each district of the <br />community; and shifting funds back into the PIP to <br />preserve the city park assets from Public Works, Police <br />and Fire Departments that have been enhanced over the <br />last few years. <br />Staff was directed to review the former Capital <br />Improvement Plan developed for the park system in the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.