Laserfiche WebLink
�r� f�.�p�ri crv�xt� <br />�P''4P�3'F�P <br />.�F���F �7 F�� �f'1� ���.� i��� �t �� �� S�i�I� <br />i'ifi� ���rr��r:r .��,�r�t�l: <br />DATE: 46/20/06 <br />ITEM No. $ • <br />Agenda Section: <br />Item Description: Consider Twin Lakes 5 Year AUAR Review Process (��3722) <br />y,� <br />�.� <br />REQUESTED ACTION: <br />Discuss the 2006 Alternate Urban Area (AUAR) 5 year review planning and <br />environmental tool. <br />BACKGROUND: <br />�.7 On August 12,2001, the City Council held a public hearing, took public testimony and <br />adopted the Twin Lakes AUAR as the planning and environmental tool for <br />redevelopmentwithin the 280 acres study area. The State Environmental Quality Board <br />(EQB) rules require a"post 5 year" review of each approved AUAR. The deadline to <br />begin such a review is August 12,2006 — to be completed within one year. <br />'?.� What must be done in the 5 year review of the AUAR for Twin Lakes is an update of <br />completed portions of the AUAR described development that lists and describes: <br />� All approvals and build-outs to date noting consistency with (or abovelbelow} the <br />AUAR thresholds, noting all issues which are less than, equal to or exceed the <br />AUAR <br />� The land uses changed beyond the limits of the AUAR <br />• Traffic changed beyond the limits estimated in the AUAR <br />� Mitigations - management for quality andlo�' storage capacity beyond what was <br />anticipated in the concept of the original AUAR plan. <br />� The remainder of the site from Fairview to Snelling, and from C-2 to Brenner <br />where very few changes have occurred. <br />The update is not an overhaul of the existing AUAR. Our staff and consultants will go <br />back to the original final AUAR document and highlight what has been changed during <br />the 5 years, and how that may have changed the mitigation procedures. Our procedure <br />will be to create a digital document that can be posted on web sites or copied to CDs. <br />Staff will not rewrite the entire document. <br />Issues relating to traffic, ttYrnin� movements and new capacity on recently rebuilt County <br />Road C must be done in a traffic model, (preferably the city's new model) or one <br />developed by a traffic consultant such as SRF, Noise and air quality issues, changes in <br />sewer and sanitary and storm water quality and capacity are also normally consultant <br />issues. An estimate of the consultant time and cost is essential and can be done. <br />