My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006_0620_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2006
>
2006_0620_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 12:51:49 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 3:34:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
214
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1����T ��I� �IT�tF ��C.�'�T�fi, A�Ii��1 <br />DATE: 03/17/03 <br />ITEM NO: <br />Department Approval: Ci�v Manager Agenda Section: <br />'I'T+� I�P ORDTNANCES <br />Item Descxip�ion: Second Readin� and Adontion of an Ordinance amending certain text <br />within Section 1002 (Definitions) and Section 1005 (Business Districts) <br />specifically pertaining to restaurants (PF 3453). <br />�.�M REQUESTED ACTION. <br />1-1 The Community Development Department has requested a number of text amendments to <br />the Roseville City Code. Specifically, it proposes to amend Section 1002, Definitions, <br />and 1005, Business Districts, pertaining to restaurants (there are over 95 locations to <br />purchase prepared food in Roseville). <br />I.? On February 24,2003, the Roseville City Council held the first reading on this ordinance <br />amendment, subject to the review by the City Attorney and review/cornment by the Saint <br />Paul Chamber of Commerce. <br />�.[� SUMMARY of RECOMMENDATION: <br />�. l The Roseville City Code Section 1002 and 1005 pertaining to restaurants has become <br />outdated and confusing, and in some cases has created land use non-conformities. The <br />Community Development Department has analyzed definitions and business district <br />allowances for restaurants and proposes new text found in this project report to replace <br />certain subsections of Section 1002 and 1005 of the Roseville City Code. A matrix <br />comparing existing language and new language is provided on page 2. <br />? t The proposed text amendment does not require changes to existing restaurants, nor does it <br />negatively impact existing restaurants. The proposed amendment is solely an amendment <br />to update and clarify the existing cumbersome text, and to allow existing restaurants to <br />become "conforming uses" within their respective zoning district. <br />3,� SUGGESTED ACTION: <br />:� � I HOLD SECOND READING & ADOPT AN ORDINANCE amending the text within <br />Section 1002 and 1005 of the Roseville City Code specifically pertainingto restaurants. <br />Project information and detailed recommendation on following pages. <br />�'�3453 —Text Amendment <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.