Laserfiche WebLink
LivingWages & Communities: Smarter Economic Development, LowerThan Expected Costs <br />Relationship to Other Research <br />As the first comprehensive overview of the direct experiences of a group of cities and counties with liv- <br />ing wage laws, this report adds to our understanding of the effects of these policies. <br />Our �ndings that living wage laws have resulted in only modest cost increases for cities are consistent <br />with most of the existing research on living wages. Studies conducted prior to the adoption of living <br />wage laws have projected their likely cost impacts on both the payrolls of city contractors and on prices <br />for city contracts. Most have predicted S ia r only a portion of the higher wage costs would he passed <br />on to cities in the form of higher contract E: • itt k' As more living wage laws have been enacted, <br />researchers have ��gun to use actual city contracting and budget data to assess the impact of living <br />wage laws in individual cities after their implementation. Several studies analyzing city contract prices <br />relatively shortly after Eiving wage laws were adopted found that cost increases were generally modest." <br />More comprehensive recent research analyzing contract costs in three cities several years after living <br />wages were implemented found that contract costs decreased in real terms in the aggregate, although <br />some individual contracts increased in price, particularly those that were bid on an hourly basis and <br />that involved large concentrations of low-wage worlcers! <br />One recent study attempted to assess �ndix�ctly the impact of living wage laws on local economies by <br />loolcing for trends in regional poverty and employment data in cities with living wage laws.g However, <br />because only a tiny percentage of workers covered by living wage laws are included in those regional <br />data sets, the study's approach and findings have been called into question by other researchers.� <br />