Laserfiche WebLink
LivingWages & Communities: Smarter Economic Development, LowerThan EXpected Costs <br />Conclusion <br />The eXperiences of the initial group of twenty cities and counties studied in this report are clear: liv- <br />ing wage requirements have not significantly increased contracting costs or adversely affected the oper- <br />ation of business subsidy programs. The overall cost increases were quite low and less than anticipat- <br />ed, generally ranging from 0.003% to 0.079% of the localities' total budgets. In some communities, <br />a few service contracts involving large concentrations of low-wageworlcers increased in cost more sub- <br />stantially, but increases were still quite modest overall. <br />The municipalities that eXtended living wage laws to their local business subsidy programs found that <br />these policies did not prevent them from attracting new businesses to their communities. Several cities <br />found that applying a living wage standard to these programs focused their economic development <br />agencies on recruiting higher wage employers, and in some cases allayed public doubts about the <br />appropriateness of using taXpayer dollars to support private businesses. <br />This snapshot of the actual effects of fully implemented living wage laws in a range of localities sheds <br />[ighc on the budget and economic consequences of such measures and provides useful guidance for <br />policymakers considering adopting living wage laws in their communities. <br />L� <br />