My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006_0828_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2006
>
2006_0828_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 12:57:51 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 3:38:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
213
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ranking Sheetfor Planning CommissionApplicants <br />From: Craig Klausing [cra�gkla�sing@comcast.netj <br />Sent: Wednesday, August 23,2006 '10:11 PM <br />To: *RVCouncil; Mary Bakeman <br />Cc: Chris Miller; Margaret Driscoll <br />Subject: Ranking Sheet for Planning Commission Applicants <br />Dear Council Members and Vice Chair Bak�man, <br />I want everyone to understand that I may not rank all of the applicants for Planning Commission. I don't think that <br />there is anyway that we can (or ought to) "force" council members or commission chairs to rank everyone if they <br />choose not to. However, I know that in the past some council members have felt that they might have ranked <br />their own choices differently if they knew that others weren't going to rank everyone. Accordingly, I wanted to <br />provide everyone with notice of my intentions. <br />Also, depending on how the council wishes to proceed, we may not need rankings for the ethics commission. In <br />the past, when had an entire group to appoint, we went through the council one by one and gave every council <br />member a chance to nominate someone. I thought that that worked well so I will be suggesting that we proceed <br />that way. I will plan on giving council members a chance to discuss this at the meeting on Monday before we <br />begin the appointment process. <br />Craig <br />P.S. Chris, could you includethis email in the council packetwith the appointment materials? Thank you. <br />--- Original Message----- <br />From: Maraaret Driscoll <br />To:'�`^�����• :il; Mary...Bakem.a,n. <br />, . ..... <br />Cc: �h_ris,_Miller <br />Sent: Tuesday,August22,2006 2:0� PM <br />Subject: Ranking Sheetfor Planning Commission Applicants <br />«couneil commission rank allplanning �6.dc�.s:• <br />Please complete the attached ranking form and bring with you to the 8/28/06 Council Meeting, or if you prefer, <br />you may return it by replying to this et�ai�. A ranking form for the Ethics Commission applicants will be available <br />at the meeting on 8/28/06. <br />Note: There will be a council item on the 8/28/06 agenda for you to consider appointing Planning and Ethics <br />Commissioners. <br />Margaret Driscoll <br />City of Roseville <br />2660 Civic Center Drive <br />Roseville MN ���13 <br />Please Note New Phone Number: 651-792-7023 <br />New FAX Number: 651-792-7020 <br />8r��r'�OO�i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.