2006_0911_Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

b. Formally amend any past action that may be interpreted as adopting the 2001 Master Plan via reference into the Comprehensive Plan and analyze the potential for the current development proposal to be considered sufficiently consistent with the underlying Comprehensive Plan designation ("BP"). Operate under the Court of Appeals opinion that the 2005 Master Plan is "ineffective," and determine whether the appropriate ComprehensivePlan designation for the area is "BP-Business Parl�," the uses and locations as described in the 2001 Conceptual Master Plan, or some combination thereof. Upon mal{ing such determination, analyze the potential for the current development proposal to be considered sufficiently consistent with the plan designation as determined. d. Garner community, policymaker, and developer consensus toward mal�ing acceptable revisions to the current development proposal and seek a City Council vote adopting this new master plan into the Comprehensive. Take actions which would effectively lead to the termination of the current Contract for Private Redevelopment and either seek new development proposals or let private market concerns dictate the future redevelopment of the Twin Lakes area. 2.13 Analysis of Options: Each of the options provided has issues has its own set of economic, political, environmental and legal impacts. City staff and legal counsel hope to engage the City Council on these impacts as part of this discussion. 3.0 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: 3. L Direct staff to further analyze the actions required (if any) to unequivocally designate the Twin Lakes development area as "BP — Business Park" as described in the Comprehensive Plan and react to the current development plan, or any future development plan, on that basis. Further, direct staff to process any pending land-use applications for the Twin Lakes area as is prescribed in City ordinance and to pursue (with further City Council consideration as prescribed) the necessary environmental review associated with processing such applications. i,� Basis for Recommendation: ■ Roseville Twin Lal{es, LLC (the Developer) has ownership interests in parcels in the Twin Lakes area. This position affords them the right to seek land use approvals for the site, including, but not limited to, environmental review and rezoning; ■ If an application is made for such approvals, the City is legally required to respond to such applications within sixty (60) days of their receipt; ■ The City's response to such application will rely, to some degree, upon the underlying ComprehensivePlan designation for the area; ■ Based on a review of historical documents. it is the staffs contention that that a 091106 Twin Lakes Options RCA.doc.dac Page 3 of 4