My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006_0925_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2006
>
2006_0925_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 2:22:04 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 3:39:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
303
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
?-� Since the creation of the parcel, the applicant has been unsuccessful in selling the lot due <br />to the inability of 6 potential buyers to design a home and attached garage that can be <br />designed in a manner that achieves all required setbacks. <br />�_kl �i'A�F ��3�i�i�'i'+IT: <br />�, I In reviewing the lot and its buildable area, the applicant has concluded that the allowance <br />of an encroachment into the front yard for an attached garage (shown on proposed site <br />plan) or living area would afford a buyer greater design flexibility on the uniquely shaped <br />parcel. <br />�, � Due to the parcel's unique shape the VARIANCE encroachment is of a triangular shape <br />which, as proposed, would include a 15-foot encroachment at the northwest comer of the <br />garage to a 2 foot encroachment at the southwest comer of the garage. The City Planner <br />has reviewedthe proposal and supports a 15-foot encroachment without design <br />limitations to afford a prospective purchaser greater home design flexibility. <br />:�, � $1004.016 (Residential Dimensional Requirements — k`�va�t Yard Building Setback) <br />requires a minimum front yard principal structure setback of 30 feet. A review of the <br />City's On-Line Mapping technology reveals most homes have been constructed at a 90 <br />degree angle to the front property lXne/stre�t in such a manner to afford greater use, and as <br />such most comply with the 30-foot front yard setback requirement. However, there are a <br />few homes in the area that were not constructed at the 30-foot setback.1821 Dale Court <br />lies approximately 21 feet from the front yard property line; 1810 Alta Vista lies <br />approximately 15 feet from the front yard properry line; and 1827, 1836, and 1844 Alta <br />Vista lie approximately 22 feet from the front yard property line. Staff is only aware of a <br />variance granted to the 1810 Alta Vista property. <br />3.� In review of the subject parcel, there is no one location that can be deemed more <br />acceptable than the other when it comes to allowing an encroachment. However, allowing <br />a front yard setback encroachment adj acent to Dale Court for an attached garage would be <br />in keeping to other legal encroachments in the direct vicinity and would (in staffs <br />opinion) cause the least amount of impact. <br />�,�? REVIEW of VARIANCE CRITERIA: <br />•�, ] Section 1013 of the Code states: "W�ere there are practical difficulties or unusual <br />hardships in the way of carrying out the strict letter of the provisions of this code, <br />the Variance Board shall have the power, in a specific case and after notice and <br />pah��c hearings, to vary any such provision �u harmony with the general purpose <br />and intent thereof and may impose such additional conditions as it considers <br />necessary so that the public health, safety, and generalwelfare may be secured and <br />substantial justice done." <br />�9'� I _Rr.�t_��r�eai_[�r�-� �f � <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.