My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006_0925_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2006
>
2006_0925_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 2:22:04 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 3:39:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
303
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4.5 The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality: This <br />particular neighborhood has been improved over a number of years. Recent homes were <br />constructed in the late 1990's and early 2000's, while others date back to the 1950's. This <br />would explain some of the variation in front yard and side yard setbacks, but does not <br />necessarily su�port such an allowance on this parcel. However, the allowance to afford <br />home design flexibilitywould only enhance the new home and lead to a design that better <br />fits the general character of the neighborhood. The Planning Division has concluded <br />that the allowance of a 15-foot VARIANCE will not alter the essential character of <br />the locality, nor adversely affect the public health, safety, or general welfare, of the <br />city or adjacent properties. <br />5.0 STAFF/VARIANCE BOARD RECOMMENDATION: <br />5.1 At the public hearing on September 6,2006, the City Planner recommended approval of <br />the requested VARIANCE based on the findings of Section 43 to 4.5 as indicated above <br />and subject to the following conditions: <br />a. The encroachment being limited to 15 feet from the front property line adjacent to <br />Dale Court. <br />b. The design of any hnrnelattached garage must minimize the impact of the <br />encroachment — be designed in such a manner that the �aoac�e/attached garage are <br />positioned angular (not 90%) to Dale Court. <br />c. The homelattached garage design must be reviewed and approved by the <br />Development Review Committee. <br />d. The variance (if granted) shall expire within 1 year of its approval if a building <br />permit is not issued pursuant to $1013.03 of the City Code. <br />5.2 On September 6,2006 the Variance Board held the public hearing regarding the <br />WeIeczki/Tllif`request. At the meeting two adjacent property owners spoke in opposition <br />to the request and Variance Board members asked questions of staff and the applicant. <br />53 Specifically, one adjacent resident was frustrated that the postcard indicated the report <br />would be available Friday, September 1, but that he could not optain the report off the <br />web page —asked that the request be postponed until he received z�o�re details about <br />request. He added that a concern was over site lines and vehicles parked on site and <br />thous traveling on Dale Court creating a safety hazard. He also asked whether the public <br />waslwoul be invited to the Design Review Committee meeting where the home plan <br />would be reviewed and potentially approved. <br />5.4 Another adjacent resident stated that the request is a direct result of the minor subdivision <br />of 2Q05 and that a variance should not be supported. <br />PF3F8 ] RC�4 �lp�ca] _OS���U� I's�� � ti� � 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.