My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006_0925_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2006
>
2006_0925_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 2:22:04 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 3:39:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
303
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE <br />CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of <br />Roseville, County of Raz�sey, Minnesota, was held on the 25" day of September, 2006, at 6:00 <br />�,m. <br />The following members were present: <br />and the following were absent: <br />Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION N O. <br />A RESOLUTION DENYING A VARIANCE TO �1004.Q1G AND IN ACCORDANCE <br />WITH ��013.02 OF THE ROSEVII,LE CITY CQ�JJE FOR CHARLES WELECZHI, <br />AND THE VACANT PARCEL AT DALE STREET AND DALE COURT (�'F3781). <br />WHEREAS, Charles Weleczki is the owner of the vacant developable parcel at Dale <br />Street and Dale Court; and <br />WHEREAS, the subject property is legally described as: <br />REQUIRES LEGAL DESCRZPTZON <br />WHEREAS, the property owner seeks a 15 foot VARTANCE to $1004.016 (Residential <br />Dimensional Requirements —Front Yard Setback) to allow greater flexibility in the design of a <br />principal structure on the uniquely shaped parcel at Dale Court and Dale Street; and <br />WHEREAS, The Roseville Variance Board held the public hearing regarding the <br />VARTANCE request, voting 3-0 to DENY based on their determination that "hardships" were <br />not present and that the need for the variance was created by the a�plicani/��raperty owner; and <br />WHEREAS, the applicant has appealed the decision of the Variance Board to the <br />Roseville City Council seeking the Council's support for the requested 15 front yard setback <br />VARTANCE; and <br />WHEREAS, the Roseville City Council concurs with the determination of the Variance <br />Board, determiningthe followingfinding of fact: <br />�,. That the applicant had options available when the original land division was <br />approved in 2005 that could have increased the uniquely shaped parcel's size, <br />offering greater design flexibility without a variance. <br />2. That a principal structure with attached garage could be designed and constructed <br />on the parcel, however, said structure most lil{ely would not be a traditional design <br />including large open living spaces and a three stall attached garage. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.