My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006_0925_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2006
>
2006_0925_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 2:22:04 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 3:39:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
303
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Regular Meeting— 09/11/06 <br />DRAFT Minutes' Page 24 <br />Anderson opined that seeking legal opinions at this time from the <br />various attorneys currently involved would prove more cost- <br />effective if and when outside and independent legal counsel were <br />sought. <br />Councilmembers Ihlan and Kough spoke in opposition to the <br />motion. <br />Councilmember Pust spoke in support of the motion, indicating <br />her adamant preference for additional information, staff and legal <br />advice. <br />Ro�l Call <br />Ayes: Maschka; Pust and Klausing. <br />Nays: Ihlan and Kough. <br />Pust moved, Maschka seconded, staff and legal counsel analysis <br />of the effect on the City to dissolve or remove master plans from <br />the amended Comprehensive Plan, and City Policy adoption to <br />discontinue this practice, on the basis of the procedural errors <br />outlined by the Court of Appeals; and whether that created a <br />procedural quandary for the City andlor staff. <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Maschka; Pust and Klausing. <br />Nays: Ihlan and Kough. <br />Councilmember Pust sought additional information and a legal <br />opinion as to blackout all amendments to the Comprehensive Plan <br />and the legal implications of doing so; as well as the Metropolitan <br />Council's input and analysis of such action. <br />Staff was directed to report back to the City Council at the <br />September 18, 2006 meeting, with additional information and cost <br />analysis for proposed services of those three firms responding to <br />the City's request for outside and independent legal counsel <br />consideration. <br />Mayor Klausing noted that, if necessary, action items and motions <br />could be pursued at that meeting, at the discretion of the Council <br />maj ority. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.