My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006_0925_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2006
>
2006_0925_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 2:22:04 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 3:39:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
303
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Study Session — 09/18/06 <br />DRAFT Minutes - Page 4 <br />Councilmember Kough personally spoke in opposition, as a <br />senior citizen, questioning what would be gained by a weekly <br />pickup; and cited concerns with additional fuel for the vehicles <br />and truck traffic on City streets. Councilmember Kough <br />expressed his satisfaction with recycling as it was currently <br />handled; and didn't support single stream recycling. <br />Councilmember Pust sought additional information related to <br />balancing benefits of additional collections versus another truck <br />on the road and additional fuel used; and questioned if the City <br />could return to every-other-week collection if the residents were <br />found to be non-supportive. <br />Mr. Pratt noted the ten percent (10%) increase in materials <br />collected in the Cities of St. Paul and Maplewood when they <br />went to weekly collection; and advised that contract provisions <br />would allow the City to return to current collection cycles, as per <br />contract provisions. <br />Councilmember Ihlan questioned the projected additional <br />revenue in going to a weekly collection; and also whether Eureka <br />was using bio diesel fuels in their vehicles. <br />Mr. Pratt projected an additional $20,000 annually in revenue <br />with weekly collection; and noted that Eureka utilized bio diesel <br />fuel in their vehicles, and were in the process of retrofitting their <br />vehicles, and was a requirement for 2007 recycling truck models. <br />Mr. Pratt noted that Eureka was not required to retrofit their fleet <br />at this time, but was voluntarily doing so. <br />Mayor K�ausing referenced the requirements of the original <br />Requests for Proposals of each firm that they provide an air <br />pollution reduction plan for their fleet. <br />Councilmember Maschka opined his support for weekly <br />collection, with another staff report in six months showing <br />results of more frequent collection. <br />Mr. Pratt advised that, in accordance with terms of the contract, <br />Eureka needed to be notified by November 1 in order to purchase <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.