My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006_1009_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2006
>
2006_1009_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 3:27:29 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 3:39:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
292
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PageIofl <br />Thomas Paschke <br />From: Pete � Me1 Zeller [zellercpa@ga[dengate.�e�� <br />Sent: Friday, August 05, 2005 9;56 PM <br />To: Thomas Paschke <br />Cc: Dennis Welsch <br />Subject: Pfanning file 3655 <br />Dear Mr. Paschke, <br />This letter is in regard to the map attached to the variance requestfor a new lot north of 1822 Dale Court. [ <br />believe it is the same map you displayed atthe planning commission meeting on August 3rd. <br />On this map, the distance from the east property line to the center of dale street is shown as 49.50'. The <br />curb is drawn about halfway between the center line of Dale Street and the east lot line. Assuming the map <br />is to scale, this distance would be about 25'. � was out at this location tonight and measured from the east <br />lot line to the edge of Dale Street. The actual distance is only 10'. Another discrepancy I noted was the <br />length of the north lot line. The map shows this distance as 12.96'. The actual distance between the two <br />north corner markers is closer to 30'. <br />I assume the survey markers recently placed are correct. They line up with other fences along Dale Street. <br />If indeed the markers are correct, this map overstates the distance from the edge of Dale Street to the lot <br />line. By relying on this drawing, the line of site to Dale Street may have been overestimated during the <br />presentation by the applicant Wednesday night. The buildable area, set-backs and structure placement all <br />depend on an accurate portrayal on this map. <br />Thomas, I was wondering if you or somebody in your office could double check the accuracy of <br />the measurements represented on the map attached to this planning file. Any further information or <br />clarification you could provide would be most appreciated. <br />Very Truly Yours, � <br />�� ���� ��.� �=1 ` <br />Pete Zeller � <br />1773 Alameda St � � � � �� � _ <br />489-1825 � �,}�,1�� �� ��`� <br />� <br />�5�� 1 �� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.