My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006_1009_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2006
>
2006_1009_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 3:27:29 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 3:39:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
292
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Kough cited a similar unique situation on Hamlir�e and Woodhill and the favorable <br />outcome and blending accomplished with the neighborhood; further opining that he didn't observe a <br />safety factor. <br />Mayor Klausing spoke in favor of the motion, as per Planning Commission recommendation for approval; <br />opining thatthe hardshiptest had been adequatelydescribed and met as outlined in the staff report. <br />Mayor Klausing noted that this accomplished a broader public policy consideration for a first-ring suburb <br />that was substantiallydeveloped to provide renewal sources for the City in encouraging smaller and <br />younger family units to remain in the City rather than locating further away. <br />Councilmember Maschka noted that the unique shape of the lot allowed an opportunityto create a <br />smaller home, and anticipated if it would be a marketable lot. CouncilmemberMaschka opined that the lot <br />was close to minimum lot size, and spoke in support of the motion. <br />Roll Call [8.1] <br />Ayes: Kough; Maschka and Klausing <br />Nays: Ihlan and Schroeder. <br />C$-�Z <br />Kough moved, Klausing seconded, approval of a minor subdivision (a three parcel Minor Subdivision, as <br />per City Code, Section 10U4.44�, creating one new parcel ("B") with a parcel size of 11,608 square fee�, <br />thereby reducing the size of existing Parcel " A to 15,514 square feet, for property located at 1822 Dale <br />Court; based on findings in Section 5 and subjectto conditions of Section 6 of the project report dated <br />August 22, 2005; including an additional condition: that a permit shall be required for any fence, <br />regardless of height; and staff is to review landscape plans at the time of building permit issue. <br />Roll Call C8.27 <br />Ayes: Kough; Maschka and Klausing <br />Nays: Ihlan and Schroeder. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.