My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006_1023_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2006
>
2006_1023_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 3:54:31 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 3:40:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
281
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Regular Meeting —1010910b <br />DRAFT Minutes - Page 10 <br />be facing new challenges due to changing community <br />demographics, and that maintaining the status quo will no <br />longer be adequate. Mr. Thibodeau challenged the City <br />Council to meet those challenges as they moved through the <br />budget process, consider the additional needs, and fund the <br />Department at a level that would allow them to meet those <br />challenges and meet the expectations of Roseville residents. <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Kough, Maschka; Ihlan; Pust and Klausing. <br />Nays: None. <br />3.i Approve a Minor Subdivision for 156 Woodlynn Avenue W <br />Mayor Klausing opened the Public Hearing at 6:42 p.m. <br />City Planner Thomas Paschke reviewed the request of Sue and <br />Richard Sta�e, 156 Woodlynn, for a Minor Subdivision, to create <br />a vacant developable parcel, consistent with $1 I 04.04� (Three <br />Parcel Minor Subdivision) to divide their current .67 acre parcel <br />into two parcels — one to include the existing home and the other a <br />developable single-family residential parcel. Mr. Paschke noted <br />that the newly-created Parcel B would require an easement to <br />encompass a portion of the driveway for the existing home's <br />garage as noted and conditioned in the staff report dated October <br />9, 2006. Staff recommended approval of the Minor Subdivision, <br />subj ect to conditions in Section 7 of the staff report. <br />Discussion included size of Parcel B and whether it met the <br />11,000 square foot threshold without the easement; easement area <br />included on Parcel B; staffs advocacy for Lots A and B sharing <br />access, however noting that City Code allows for multiple access <br />points on a public street as long as impervious surface <br />requirements are met; and square footage of neighborhood lots. <br />1} Councilmember Kough, with Councilmember Ihlan's <br />concurrence, noting Lot B was inconsistent with the <br />character of the neighborhood and expressed a preference <br />for retaining large lots in the City of Roseville, and the need <br />to review current code, given the repeated various requests <br />being heard. <br />Minor Subdivision <br />156 Woodlynn <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.