My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006_1023_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2006
>
2006_1023_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 3:54:31 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 3:40:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
281
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Study Session —10116105 <br />DRAFT Minutes - Page 11 <br />for local control and local decision-making for <br />communities and their citizens. <br />Mayor Klausing thanked Mr. Jambois for his presentation; <br />and requested a copy of the AMM Policies for the 2006107 <br />legislative year, once they're available. <br />5. Receive an Update from the Development Attorney <br />regarding Twin Lakes Issues <br />Mayor Klausing and Community Development Director John <br />Stark outlined the specific questions from last week's Council <br />meeting, and noted that Mr. Stark and Development Attorney <br />Rod Krass would attempt to answer those questions. <br />Development Attorney Rod Krass noted that he was constrained <br />about this discussion in open public forum, given the present <br />situation with the City in maj or litigation regarding <br />condemnation, the need to protect the contractual and good faith <br />covenant agreement between the City and developer; and the <br />financial impacts to both or either party that may be a result of <br />any decisions a�cUor discussion at the table tonight. <br />Councilmember Ihlan suggested a closed executive session for <br />discussion. <br />Discussion included advice of City Attorney Jay Squires as to <br />whether to close the meeting tonight, or at a future meeting, <br />given legal notification requirements, and attorneylclient <br />provisions; Mr. Kough's absence from this discussion; costs for <br />Mr. �ras�'s time; and no prior notice to the public of a closed <br />session. <br />After further discussion, it was Council consensus to hold off on <br />a Closed Executive Session until October 23, 2006, at <br />approximately S:3U p.m., just prior to the regular business <br />meeting. Staff was so directed to provide appropriate public <br />notice and postings. <br />Mr. Stark reviewed various questions related to the level of <br />environmental review — whether a broad-based AUAR or a <br />project-specific EAW/��S — preferred, monetary benefits and <br />Update from the <br />Development <br />Attorney regarding <br />Twin Lakes Issues <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.