My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006_1113_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2006
>
2006_1113_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 1:18:10 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 3:40:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
205
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Excerpts ofthe DRAFTNovember 1,2006 <br />Roseville Planning Commission meeting <br />b : fPLANNING FILE 3693 ; <br />�'dValser Automotive Group seeks approval of an INTERIM USE PERMIT for temporary <br />riutomotive repair and service operations at 2980 Cleveland Avenue while their permanent <br />iacility at 2775 Highway 35 N are being reconstructed. <br />� A�air i"raynor opened the Public Hearing at for Planning File 3793 at 8:05 p.m. <br />.[;ity Planner Thomas Paschke reviewed the request of Walser Automotive Group, in <br />- r;ooperatior� with St. Paul Properties, Inc. for approval of an INTERIM USE PERMIT, in <br />I��ccordanee with Section 101209 of Roseville City Code, to allow the establishment of a <br />temporary auto service garage to minimize disruption of customer service during construction <br />I s�f their newdealership at 2775 Highway 35. <br />9VIr. Paschke noted that, as Walser had developed their final engineering and construction <br />clocuments, as well as contracting with a developerlb€�ilder, they had determined that the <br />: flrigina� finro-phase redevelopmentwould create a detrimental disruption to service operations � <br />�;and project construction, as well as an extended construction timeline, and would not be in <br />� the best interest of their customers. <br />Mr. Paschke advised that Walser had discussed with staff the possibility of temporary use of i <br />an off-site facility at 2980 Cleveland Avenue for auto service. Mr. Paschke noted that use of i <br />khe facility would require either a Conditional use Permit or and Interim Use Permit, with stafi � <br />determining that an Interim Use Permit would the appropriate process for approval. Mr. <br />�aschke advised that no exterior improvements were proposed, only interior improvements <br />such as air handiinglexchange system and hydraulic vehicle lifts; and would need reviewand <br />�approval by the City's Building Official. Mr. Paschke reviewed the proposed conditions for <br />interim use of the property. <br />Staff recommended approval of the INTERIM USE PERMIT, based on the comments and ' <br />findings of Section 5, and subject to the conditions outlined in Section 6, of the project reporl <br />dated November 1, 2006. <br />Applicant, Don Shilling (160 Bighorn Drive — 6'�21G15-25i1), Director of Facilities for <br />Walser Group <br />Mr. Shilling concurred with staff's presentation. � <br />Commissioner Wozniak questioned the proposed traffic or parking volume of the service I <br />department. <br />Mr. Shilling estimated that each service bay averaged 3-4 vehicles per day; and noted thai <br />� technicians intended to road test the vehicles befinreen the drop off site at Walser's currenk <br />� facility at 2775 Highway 35 and the temporary facility at 2980 Cleveland Avenue, with <br />� vehicles returned to the permanent site for customer pick-up, thus eliminating any additiona� I <br />traffic at the temporary site. Mr. Shilling advised that no quick lube or high-traffic generatior . <br />� was proposed at the Cleveland site during the temporary use of the facility. <br />� Additional discussion included access to Langton Lake ball fields and overFlow parking on th� <br />� site for those activities; and proposed hours of operation (7:Uf� a.m. — 5:f3f� p.m.). Staff noted . <br />� that they were unaware that an agreement existed for park use overflow parking with tf�e <br />: property owner. <br />' Commissioner Bake�ar� questioned if customers would use the Long Lake Road facility fo� ; <br />' drop off and/ar overnight parking, rather than the Cleveland facility. � <br />- Mr. Shilling responded affirmatively; noting that the Cleveland facility service bays wouEcl <br />; need to be cleaned after business hours. and there mav be several vehicles aarked o�erni�hf <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.