My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006_1113_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2006
>
2006_1113_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 1:18:10 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 3:40:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
205
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Excerpts ofthe DRAFT November 1,2006 <br />itoseville PlanningCommissionmeeting <br />a, PLANNING F[LE 3791 <br />Art Mueller seeks approval of a PRELIMINARY PLAT for the proposed subdivision of the <br />residential property at 2201 Acom Road into four (4) single-family lots served by a public <br />- street. <br />Chair Traynor opened the Public Hearing at for Planning File 3791 <br />City Planner Thomas Paschke reviewed the request of Mr. Mueller to subdivide his 1.9 acre <br />parcel into four (4) single-family residential lots served by a public street and public utilities. <br />Mr. Paschke noted that the proposal complies with all code requirements, and does not <br />require Comprehensive Land Use Map designation amendment or a rezoning. <br />� Chair Trayr�or reviewed the previous case before the Commission for a Planned Unit <br />Development (PUD), with a private street, and requested that staff explain the difference in <br />that and this request. <br />City Planner Paschke briefly reviewed the request and explained that the previous PUD was <br />� for a private street versus the public street now proposed; and noted that staff had nnt <br />I determined that no portion of tonight's request was not in compliance with current City code. <br />City Attorney Langel concurred with the previous discussion points <br />Commissioner Wozniak opined that the PUD allowed for more input from the City toward the <br />development of the lots as opposed to the proposed plat at tonight's meeting. <br />Mr. Paschke advised that with the proposed Preliminary Plat meeting all current code <br />requirements, the City's ability to place conditions on the developmentwere limited {i.e., tree <br />preservation; lot size modifications), and would not allowfor modifying setbacks or <br />Applicant, Art Mueller, was present, but had no comment at this time. <br />Staff recommended approval of the PRELIMINARY PLAT for Art Mueller, creating four (4} <br />legal, conforming residential lots and a public cul-de-sac street on the 1.9 acre parcel at 2201 <br />Acom Road, as conditioned in the staff report dated November 1,2006. <br />Commissioner aohe�ty left the meeting at this time to attend another scheduled <br />meeti ng. <br />Public Comment <br />Joel Cheney, 2172 Acorn Road <br />Mr. Cheney had numerous questions on setbacks; similar and recent development in 1h� <br />same neighborhood; determination of front setback requirements; and his concerns regarding <br />those setback requirements and drainage issues. <br />Mr. Paschke addressed several of Mr. Cheney's concerns, as well as misconception:f <br />regarding the proposed Preliminary Plat for 2201 Acom Road. Mr. Paschke advised that <br />� placement of a home on a lot determined what was the frontage of the lot, and on whicr� <br />street it became addressed to, noting that the rear or side yard setbacks had yet to bes <br />� identified, depending on the development and building permitting processes and wher� <br />� individual plans and documentation were submitted; and clarified that the Planning <br />� Commission was considering the creation of four (4), legal, conforming residential lots and � <br />, public cul-de-sac street on the 1.9 acre parcel at 2201 Acom Road. Mr. Paschke advise� <br />� that staff had yet to review final utility and drainage plans, but noted that those reviews and <br />� approvals would be part of the permitting process, as dictated by code and administered by <br />staff. <br />Mr. Chenev had additional comments specific to recent development of his propertv and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.