Laserfiche WebLink
Highway 49 �� CSAH Tnrnbaclz <br />Sr�rnmary/Background Information <br />November 15,2006 <br />Jurisdiction Chan�e <br />Trunk Highway 49 was tumcd back to Ramsey County from tl�e State of Minnesota as part of a <br />cat�ntywide functional consolidation of roadways. The transfer occurred in two segments --1-694 to <br />County Road J in November 1996 and University Avenue to 1-694 in 2002. The change added just over <br />11 miles to tl�e County State Aid Highway (CSAH) system. Portions of Highway 49, north of County <br />Road .� �+�r� also turned bacic to Anoka County. Iiighway 49 functions as an A-minor Arterial providing a <br />critical nor�h/south transportation link for both Counties and several cities. Traffic volumes of 10,000 to <br />21,000 vehicles per day continue to grow in response to land development, vehicles/trips per household <br />and regional congestion. <br />The impetus for Highway 49 anc� similar transfers was to selectively reassign roadways to the correct <br />jurisdiction -- where decisions on aperatinns, maintenance, and improvements would be inac(� within an <br />appropriate context. Roadways such as Highway 49, while extremely important locally, often slip to a <br />low priority withi�� MnDOT's system of i��te►•-region/interstate highways. Under current funding <br />constraints, MnDOT has had to focus on larger regional transportation issues, leaving many needs on low <br />priority roadways unmet. Turning a Highway, such as TH 49 back to a County opens the door to evaluate <br />maintenance and investment according to local priorities, where the highway may be of greater <br />importance. The transfer of Highway 49 to the County also makes maintenance and improvements <br />eligible for funding from the CSAH Turnbaeic Account. <br />Fr�r��r�v���r��r.�•�� }�a: rr_,.x�rrrr.s <br />The County did attempt to evaluate Highway 49 needs with input from affected camanu�aities. Early <br />discussions identified a number of issues and concerrts but, aside from three specific problem areas, did <br />not muster more than passive support for an aggressive reconstruction schedule. It was agreed immediate <br />improvements should be sought in the Chippewa Middle School area north of Highway 96, and also in <br />the interchange areas for Highway 36 and I-G94. The later areas, of course, requi�•e close coordination <br />and cooperative funding with MnDOT. Otl�er improvements to Highway 49 were to follow a more <br />flexible long-term approach utilizing a combination of maintenance and full reconstruction where and <br />when warranted, with interchange improvements helping define some of those needs. <br />Inznro�errxerzt/Plann�n� to Date <br />Reconstruction of Highway 49 from Bridge Street to Birch Lane South was completed in 2002, resolving <br />long standing safety issues at Chippewa Middle School, correcting traffic cot��licts/e�e�cie�cies in the <br />commercial area surrounding the �-�igl�way 95/I-�iglzway 49 intersection and at Tanglewood Drive, as well <br />as increasing traffic capacity along the segment. <br />A mill and overlay has been completed in 2004 between Maryland Avenue and the Railroad Bridge just <br />nortE� of Pennsylvania Avenue to extend pave�nent life. Similar maintenance is likely on other portions <br />south of County Road B as pavement conditions degrade. <br />Significant planning continues for ir�terchange i;nprovcE�enTs at 1-694 and TH 36. Heavy congestion in <br />those areas clearly affects mainline flows for Highway 36 and �-694, anc� significantly affects service <br />levels along Highway 49. It is generally agreed new interchanges would be a major benefit to the <br />traveling public, and also provide key features of the framework for reconstructing Highway 49. Early <br />� rir:.�v�,���,s. � r '.-.'�� <br />