My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006_1204_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2006
>
2006_1204_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2014 4:32:36 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 3:41:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
133
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City CouncilStudy Session-1X/20106 <br />DRAFT Minutes - Page 7 <br />City reserves to use; funding sources available for single-family <br />neighborhoods; and availability of the Housing Resource Center. <br />Ms. Shay requested the Council's consideration of the petition <br />request as they discuss the policy perspective; and recognize the <br />need of small complexes that cannot come up with the $3 <br />Million to bond for improvements; and asked that they keep that <br />in mind during their deliberations. <br />Mayor Klausing noted that the Public Hearing would be held on <br />December 18, 2006 at the regular City Council meeting. <br />Councilmember Maschka requested that Ms. Bennett identify <br />and provide information on other funding options a�zdlor possible <br />private funding options for associations as discussed. <br />4. Discuss Public Policy on Lot Splits <br />Community Development Director John Stark provided a <br />detailed summary of existing subdivision regulations as they <br />apply to single-family residential properties; a description of <br />where subdividable lots were located within the City; influence <br />of lot size on community character; larger City policy <br />implications of changing single-family residential lot <br />subdivisions; and other potential regulation options. Mr. Stark <br />noted four areas of concentration of larger lots (�.e., Acorn Road; <br />Gluek Lane; Lake Josephine; and Lake 4wasso}, consisting of <br />approximately 85properties. <br />Mr. Stark identified policy implications that included: housing <br />affordability; increase of housing stock; property taxes; diversity <br />of housing stock; property-owner rights and expectations; <br />property values; and preservation of Open Space. <br />Mr. Stark provided several potential lot split options including: <br />1) maintaining existing single-family residential <br />zonin�lsubdivision code; 2) revising the single-family residential <br />eode/subdivision code; 3) creation of a neighborhood <br />conservation overlay; or 4) establishing a large-lot zoning <br />district. <br />Discussion included age definitions for subdivisions and <br />Discuss <br />Public Policy <br />Lot Splits <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.