2006_1204_Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

City Council Study Session —111201U� DRAFT Minutes - Page 13 PIan/Known Plans); and similar impacts; and comparisons were made for numerous intersections with existing conditions; year 2030 with Scenario 1A Build Condition projections and Year 2030 Scenario 1�3 Build Conditionprojections. Additional discussion included surface water runoff impacts and mitigation plans; and land coverlwildlife mitigation impacts and mitigation plans. The next steps were discussed: ■ City Council determination that the AUAR update is complete and accurate; ■ City Council authorization of AUAR update for 10-day comment period (by applicable agencies); ■ AUAR update 10-day comment period; ■ Respond to objections, if filed; * And adoption of the Twin Lakes Business Park AUAR Update. Throughout the presentation, Councilmembers addressed related questions for clarification by Mr. Stark or Ms. Schlichting; and proposed Policy decisions for the City Council were outlined within the document. Mr. Stark clarified that Rottlund Homes was a principal in Twin Lakes, LLC and the land use application submitted in October of 2006; and advised that it was not the intent of the applicant to create confusion as to the identify of the applicant; and the application had been resubmitted by Roseville Twin Lakes Properties, LLC, the original applicant with whom the City has a Development Agreement, to avoid future confusion. City Council discretion was discussed regarding when they approved the DRAFT document and authorized distribution activating the comment period; the valid contract with DSU to complete the DRAFT AUAR Update; and the land use application and 60-day review period. 9.a Request of Councilmember Ihlan: Legal update and discussion on status of Twin Lakes development agreement now that the Court of Appeals decision is final — whether