Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, August 17, 2009 <br />Page 9 <br />Councilmember Roe expressed his concern in not clearly referencing the docu- <br />ments submitted on April 22, 2008; that that they remain the guiding document, <br />as detailed on page 2 of 10 of the amended PUD Agreement, as attachments. <br />Councilmember Roe noted that tonight's action was only to phase the originally- <br />approved project, and that without referencing those original exhibits, the connec- <br />tion could be lost. <br />Further discussion ensued ensuring that the Phase II dates for reference (April 22, <br />2008) to be included on the original and amended PUD Agreement. <br />City Attorney Anderson opined, from his perspective, that references in the <br />Agreement to Phase I documents are new documents that have yet to be created to <br />show the interplay between Phases I and II, such as Exhibit H-2, and that the City <br />indicated therein that the Phase II floor plan show that the floor plan not deviate <br />from the plan submitted in the original plan submitted in 2008. <br />Councilmembers Roe and Johnson, as makers of the original motion, amended <br />that motion as follows: Roe moved, Johnson seconded, adoption of Resolution <br />No. 10743 entitled, "A Resolution Approving an Amendment to PLANNED <br />UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT #1375, Applewood Pointe at Langton <br />Lake (PF07-006);" (said agreement identified as Attachment J to the Request for <br />Council Action dated August 17, 2009) as approved September 15, 2008 and re- <br />vised August 17, 2009; stipulating that Exhibits C.2, D.2, G.2, H.2, and I.2 dated <br />April 22, 2008 as detailed on pages 2 and 3 of the Agreement, remain in place as <br />originally presented. <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Pust; Johnson; Roe and Klausing. <br />Nays: None. <br />b. Adopt Professional Services Policy <br />City Manager Malinen presented a summary of the revisions in the proposed Pro- <br />fessional Services Policy for City Council consideration. <br />Mayor Klausing addressed remaining concerns on page 2, lines 3 - 5 related to <br />the City Council's representation in evaluations and/or interviews of candidates. <br />Mayor Klausing expressed concern that this blurred the City Council's policy role <br />and the City Manager's managerial functions, and the City Manager's hiring of <br />City Attorneys subject to City Council approval. Mayor Klausing advised that he <br />had no problem if a Councilmember wanted to participate, however, he preferred <br />that it not be mandated. Mayor Klausing further noted that this should remain a <br />City Council matter, and not be formally adopted as part of this policy. <br />Discussion included individual Councilmember involvement and preference to <br />have input into the evaluation process, to allow a conduit to the City Manager to <br />