My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005_0110_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2005
>
2005_0110_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 10:10:45 AM
Creation date
9/14/2009 9:58:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
252
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Special Meeting — 12/27/04 <br />DRAFT Minutes - Page 18 <br />than that offered to other City employees. Councilmember <br />Kough cautioned opening up the contract to renegotiate the <br />COLA, which would allow for potential renegotiation of other <br />areas of the contract. <br />Finance Director Miller reminded Councilmembers that the 2005 <br />Budget and Levy just adopted assumed that everyone — city-wide <br />— received a two percent COLA. <br />Mayor Klausing noted that staff had negotiated in good faith, <br />based on the preliminary budget and proposed COLA at three <br />percent. <br />Councilmember Maschka questioned how Councilmember <br />Kough justified his recommended two percent for some <br />employees, and three percent for union employees. <br />Councilmember Ihlan questioned use of contingency funds if <br />arbitration was required and successful. <br />City Manager Beets noted that the union had voted on this <br />contract, and if the City returned, it was at the union's discretion <br />whether all or part of the contract was reopened for negotiation. <br />Kough moved, Ihlan seconded, approval of the proposed terms <br />and conditions for the 2005-2006 Collective Bargaining <br />Agreement between the International Union of Operating <br />Engineers (Loca149) and the City of Roseville; and directed staff <br />to prepare the necessary documents for execution, contingent <br />upon City Attorney review and approval as to legal form. <br />Councilmembers Maschka and Schroeder spoke in opposition to <br />the motion. <br />Mayor Klausing spoke against the motion due to the <br />inconsistency of COLA among employees. <br />Discussion ensued regarding timing of union negotiations; staff <br />assumptions in their negotiations; consistency of wage increases <br />among employees; and implications to the budget and use of <br />contingency funds to fund the additional COLA at three percent <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.