Laserfiche WebLink
3. Review Neighborhood Enhancement: <br />a. Responding to Request of the City Council <br />+ ��� ]�w�, <br />1. Significant increase in SF rental properties, college housing <br />2. Increase residential complaints <br />3. Increase in tenant complaints <br />• Har7v: <br />1. Study Issues <br />2_ Review Implementation Strategies <br />3. Gain input from residents, public agencies, businesses <br />• Limitations: <br />1. Weak Housing Maintenance Code <br />2. Code Enforcement abilities restricted <br />3. No incentive to maintain or improve <br />4. HRAJCour�cil Cohesiveness: <br />a. Understand Key Housing Issues Together <br />b. Align Goals �� Objectives <br />a Increase Trust & Effectiveness <br />• How: <br />1. Hold Housing Strategy Session <br />2. Include other policy makers — schools, county commissioners <br />• Obj ective: <br />1. Move forward together <br />2. Understand organizational capacity & roles <br />3. Make necessary changes <br />B) Bud�et Issues to Consider for 2006 & Bevond <br />1. Funding a Neighborhood Enhancement Program <br />a. New Program would require new staff <br />b. Program would only be effective if fu��ded <br />�. HRA may recommend strategy bu� would need full Council support for funding <br />and implementation <br />d. Ultimately the Council decision <br />2. Long Range Financial Strategy for Housing <br />a. Review current and future funds <br />b. Review strategies for providing services for next 5 years and beyond <br />• How: <br />1. HRA Subcommittee established <br />2. Council liaison work with HRA on issue <br />� What: <br />1. HRA Levy <br />2. Borrow against Loan Funds <br />3. Grants/Foundations funding <br />4. Tax Increment Financing <br />5. Bonding <br />� <br />