My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005_0314_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2005
>
2005_0314_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 2:13:47 PM
Creation date
9/14/2009 9:59:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
307
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Jho�•eland OrdinanceB-6Zoning Ordinance Sunzmaiy T�vin Lakes Mixed U.se Redevelo��nent - hoseville, Minnesota <br />SanitarySewerCapacity/�Yaier- :��i•':,�.�.ti .5�rr�rn�r����•System/RoaclwayCapacity February 1Q 2005 <br />GovernmentApprovals ScheClule/Site Plan I�•��f: r� •�� ��: ��. � Page 3 of 7 <br />B-6 Zoning Ordinance <br />Rottlund Homes is proposing to rezone Phase I of the Twin Lakes Redevelopment Area from I-],I-2, B- <br />1, and B-4 zoning classifications to a Planned Unit Development (PUD) with an underlying zoning of B- <br />6, Mixed Use Business Park District. This rezoning request is proposed to accommodate Rotilund's <br />development plans for Phase 1. The Rottlund development plan consists of retail, restaurant, and office <br />space, and a���ix of residential units. Each of these land uses generally breaks down into the following <br />categories: <br />��ild� nk �qU� rc E"�avla�e —� - - � — <br />� !_gnd [: s� I[u �si��� � nit� .+4 r�+� o E f.a r�rl <br />i — ��� .� ._I —- I <br />i�C�31� .�RS��'�' ���.��� �E' i����i4'x <br />Rt'�1<1 uran[� >_fF.� U�� ti F-' � <br />��Cl i�u S�xac� _ --�— • - �? 1, I 5(} � F �-- - - ! �� �4crG <br />'����� ' ���� n i s . �CF r�crc.: <br />1_r�l� '.. . — , �.�0 � i n i�� S .—._ . . <br />Ur�n l-�iwnL��aFnrs � � ]�� l.'� i1 s <br />C�ahlc R�tir 1't�u�i5'��Rl�� i�$ 4� n i;.; � <br />- - — - -a <br />1�adYl it: i iy;��•��,I i i u.l ll�t' _ I�:1 � I�w � <br />Comprehensive Plan <br />In 2001, the City of Roseville amended its Comprehensive Plan for the Twin Lakes Redevelopment Area <br />to BP-Business Park. This land use designation-is designed to reflect a business/office park environment <br />with support and a��ci�lary land uses such as retail, health care, fitness, lodging, and multi-family housing. <br />The Business Park land use is reserved for areas that will be master planned as one entity, ai�c! will <br />incorporate infrastructure and amenities sucla as transit facilities, landscape design, park and trail systems, <br />and aesthetic and security lighting. <br />The Twin Lakes Master Plan was also completed in 2001 as a supplement to the City's Comprehensive <br />Plan. The 2001 Master Plan was heavily dominated by office, medical, technology, medical ca�np�is, and <br />hospital land �ises. Most of these land uses are no longer supported by the inarketplace and as a result, <br />could not be expected to materialize in any reasonable timeframe. The City's attorney has concluded that <br />the �`wttt Lakes Master Plan may be amended to reflect R�,�kS�nFu's Phase I Plan without the need to <br />amend the City's Comprehensive Plan. <br />7����iii� <br />After reviewing the City's zoning categories, it is our opinion that the B-6, Mixed Use Business Park <br />District, is most appropriate classification to both implement the City's Comprehensive Plan for the Twin <br />Lakes Redevelopment Area and also to accommodate the proposed Rottlund Phase I development plan. <br />The City's Zoning Code includes several residential categories ranging from the traditional �-1 single- <br />family district to the R-7 apartment park district. The focus of these zoning districts of course is to <br />regulate the location and design of varying forums of residential land uses. The residential districts will <br />also allow land uses that most view as residentia�-con�patible under varying fortti�s of regulation. For <br />example, daycace facilities are "permitted" uses in the R-i, R-2, R-4, and R-5 districts as are public parks, <br />playgrounds, and other "low impact" public uses; all arguably, low impact, residentially compatible land <br />uses. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.