Laserfiche WebLink
ShorelQnd �J�'di�zanceB-6 Zoning Ordinance Summary Twrn Lakes Mixed U.se Rerleveloj�menz - f2osevilfe Minnesota <br />Sanitary Sewer. Capacity/Water �;,ti�,+,,,;r.. i'r: �•��iLi �r.�r�• System/Roadway Capacity Fe6ruary I�, 2005 <br />Governmeni Approvals Schedule/Site Plan Modifcadions Page 6 d 7 <br />Rottlund Proposal would result in approximately 40% less water use than what was anticipated �A� the <br />2001 AUAR. <br />Stormwater System <br />As outlined in il�e AUAR as well as Rot�lutld's preliminary star�nwater analysis, redevelopment of the <br />Twin Lakes site will result in reduced stor�nwater runoff from the site. Sior�nwater detention and <br />infiltration is planned as part of the Rottilund Proposal, which will provide for water quality and rate <br />control prior to discharging fi'otn the site. The proposed Rottlund improvements will be consistent with <br />City of Roseville's comprehensive stormwater management plan and Rice Creek Watershed District <br />requirements. By adhering to City and Watershed guidelines, there will be no significant impacts to the <br />adjacent storm sewer system as a result of the Twin Lakes Redevelopment. <br />Roadway Capacity <br />— SRF Cons�lia��t� prepared a memorandum in June 2004 that compared tlie anticipated trip generation of <br />the May 2001 AUAR with the present Rottlund Proposal. The memorandum detailed tlie anticipated year <br />2020 average daily traffic (ADT) volumes for the AUAR and for the Rottlund Proposal. The figures <br />shown in the SRF memorandum indicate that anticipated ADT volumes for the Rottlund Proposal are less <br />than the AUAR anticipated voiuii�es and therefore less of an impaci to tlie adjacent roadway system. <br />In addition, Ramsey County l�as identified that County road improvements associated with their Capital <br />I�nproveinents Plan anticipated the traffic volumes that were identified in the May 2001 AUAR. Based <br />on the reduction in traffic anticipated from the SRF comparison between the 2001 AUAR and the <br />Rottlund Proposal, and the County's inclusion of their anticipated improvements in the 2001 AUAR, the <br />adjacent roadway system is adequate for the Rottlund Proposal. <br />Government Approvals Schedule <br />The following government approvals schedule identifies anticipated permits necessary for the Rottlund <br />proposaL It should be noted tltat tl�e May 2001 AUAR did not idei�tify several necessary permits; these <br />additional permits are now identified with an asterisk. <br />Unit of Government Type of Application 2001 Rottlund <br />Status Pro osal <br />, , _.._ ,..m �_.._��.. __.._... . ,- - - . ,,. _ _.. _. ... . <br />Federal Government <br />Environmental Protection A enc EPA Su lemental Brownfields A lication A roved Future <br />Federal Aviation Agency (FAA) Determination of Heli�ad Routes Future - NIA <br />��� �t� <br />r��J in ntY�rl,i Pr�lLu�inn C���rli r�l A�tn�}� (��1P�'A j i I� P1]F� Pcri� it '�-- --- �- i F�iw� � <br />f�Jd'�'}� ° Ifldir�d �;r�ur�r Perni i� I� ui ure <br />� hAf'�� - -- - _ _ . . . �eiila � ��`cwer Fxlcnsian Peirnit J�uiure � <br />A+IP�'}� ��lun��r,�_L•M[er�si+�n�+�har�� L-'tierrhi� _ l'ul�r� <br />A+IPC=,4 �rl�-i'���ti _ - _ •-- •• — • ' <br />1�1F'�.r� PL�rr�l�um C'nnisirinettid Sn�l * <br />- --•-•--••--- •. ._. ... . .. . <br />ME'C'r� ft.es nsr r���sori 2'laa� * <br />h�lF'("�4 T51q7iC� 4� �C�Iri j����7ii i�l •f �il�'.�I r4�Cl. �Cit'. * <br />h�fPC_r�,�•1 innrs�ola ?tr�,�ri i� I� � I' I I rxlt`i A shcwl �7s�l�u'_Ldin� �ii7ti,l i; ir� u Sue��e�� _ * � <br />T++[i rinc��4k� ]�� artmrn[ t�d E �cali:i ( L���E J j V4'�l�rrnuin Lxl�n�ic�n 1�'u[ur�e <br />I�il hri�St1[a L��]?�u[ntvn[ s�� N�[urr k{�Y��urc4s 1'rt I�m�nar�� k'L:iA A�aRrcr4�ul � <br />I�Ui,�r� - — <br />hir'A <br />�� ule�re <br />]'U�ti rr � <br />f�cn�i i�� i <br />]�end ine <br />}'�'.�ld i �L� <br />Ful�ir� <br />�'L I14� Ifl � � <br />f� u ltir� <br />Fut�re � <br />