Laserfiche WebLink
[print version] Intel to back broadband role for cities J CNET News.com Page 1 of 2 <br />� �E1II����Q�1 h��tp;��www,ne,�� ��m� <br />Intel to back broadband role for cities <br />By Richard Shim <br />�#t� -�fnf:w�_cc�rn �c�ra-a�knt���t��ba�c+��a��ar.-d ���+#�r+��e� � ��� ��4_ 3.-5532714..}�fiml <br />Story last modified Tue Jan 11 17:47:00 PST 2005 <br />Chip giant Intel on Wednesday plans to provide a high-level perspective on the ongoing <br />debate over the role of the public and private sectors in providing broadband services. <br />In a speech at the Wreless CommunicationsAssociation in San Jose, Calif., Intel Executive <br />Vice President Sean Maloney is expected to encourage commercial service providers and <br />public agencies such as city governments and municipalities to work together in building out <br />new broadband infrastructure. <br />Intel has a keen interest in the proliferation of wireless broadband technology and industries <br />using it; by early next year it plans to produce WMax chips for networking equipment that <br />carriers can use to sell high-speed Internet access to consumers. WiMax is a promising <br />wireless broadband technology allowing data to be wirelessly transmitted across several miles <br />at transfer rates of several megabits per second. <br />"Sole responsibility, either from government or a single carrier, of a city's wireless network is <br />not the best solution for growing the market," said a source familiar with the chipmaker's <br />position in wireless broadband policy. "A sharing of responsibilities is what will encourage <br />broadband adoption, and that will be a key point in Intel's policy proposal." <br />P,ABF�ney will outline the company's high-level policy position and will speak out against efforts <br />to ban municipally owned networks. In recent years, phone companies and cable providers <br />have actively lobbied local and state governments to ban public agencies and municipalitie� <br />from building their own communications networks. The commercial providers have been <br />successful in some regions of the country. <br />lr� �m� instances, commercial providers will be able to build networks and offer the best <br />�network choice to customers at affordable prices. But in other instances, such as low-income <br />ar��s ❑r rural locations, it might make more sense for a city or some other municipality to build <br />infrastructure. <br />"We welcome Intel's position and strongly support collaboration between the public and private <br />sectors," said Jim Ball�r, a principal attorney for the Baller Herbst Law Group and a leading <br />expert on municipally owned networks. <br />Intel's position is partly in response to strong lobbying by Verizon Communications that <br />helped lead to the passage of a law in ���r����v��i� that prohibits cities from offering Internet <br />access to their residents for a fee. Verizon and other incumbent phone companies had urged <br />legislators to ban municipally owned networks to prevent other cities from following the lead of <br />lti��s�?r'i�����.�a,7�.�.�nL'�.] i��-1 iJaa_ -��3�� I� F,tri71`.'EG4�' °,�E.11fiLI,F;ini :};']?�+J+JS <br />