My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005_0328_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2005
>
2005_0328_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 1:50:26 PM
Creation date
9/14/2009 10:00:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
195
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Study Session — 03/21/05 <br />DRAFT Minutes - Page 11 <br />Proposed projects for 2005 were outlined as follows, with Mr. <br />Brokke noting that the 2005 budget at $150,000, had been <br />continuing to be reduced annually. <br />Item Amount <br />Park Si ns $20,000 <br />Pla round E ui ment Sandcastle Park 30,000 <br />Rosebrook Field Li htin 50,000 <br />Tennis court resurface Victoria 15,000 <br />Athletic Field U rades Victoria Dred in 15,000 <br />Landsca in 10,000 <br />Amenities Picnic table, rills 5,000 <br />Bleacher ads, Victoria 2, Le ion Field 5,000 <br />Discussion included use of pervious or impervious surfaces; park <br />sign enhancements; feasibility of a golf driving range at the <br />OVAL during the summer; elimination of previous debt in this <br />fund; original source of bonding monies for the fund; future <br />Study Session agenda item related to the scope for projected <br />implementation over a five-year period of the outstanding capital <br />projects (i.e., replacement of warming houses/shelters); changing <br />uses of area parks; Master Plan development or redevelopment in <br />specific neighborhoods; updated community and neighborhood <br />input on park uses and their reactions to overall individual park <br />plans and systems. <br />6. Public Works-City Hall Building Project: A Recap <br />Public Works Director Duane Schwartz, in his capacity as <br />Project Manager for the project, provided a final recap of the <br />budget for the project and the overall observations of the <br />construction experience. Mr. Schwartz reviewed various <br />components and goals of the proj ect: <br />Project Delivery <br />■ Construction management versus hard bid awarded to one <br />general contractor; <br />■ Minimize number of poorly performing subcontractors <br />versus change of getting poorly performing general <br />contractor; <br />■ Ability to choose construction manager based on <br />qualifications. <br />Recap <br />Public Works <br />City Hall <br />Building Project <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.