My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005_0411_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2005
>
2005_0411_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 11:47:05 AM
Creation date
9/14/2009 10:00:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
230
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Regular Meeting — 03/28/05 <br />DRAFT Minutes - Page 12 <br />numerous amendments if the City Council considered <br />action tonight, but noted her preference to table the item <br />pending further discussion and refinement. <br />Councilmember Kough thanked Chief Sletner for her work <br />on this proposed ordinance, but expressed his concern <br />related to provocation of animals; kennel dimensions; and <br />determining authorities to enforce the ordinance; opining <br />his preference for enforcing state statutes at this time. <br />Acting Mayor Maschka, noting the lack of consensus for <br />this item, sought comment from City Manager Beets for <br />recommendation. <br />City Manager Beets noted that, in light of tonight's <br />comments, staff needed to determine amended language <br />that would keep provisions that staff felt were necessary to <br />supplement state statute for enforceability, and return at a <br />later date for further Council review of those amendments. <br />Acting Mayor Maschka requested that Councilmember <br />Ihlan provide her recommendations to staff for inclusion <br />in revised language. <br />City Manager Beets noted staff's preference to get <br />something in place at this time of year, given its nature for <br />more complaints. Mr. Beets further noted that state <br />statutes often set the framework, with local legislation <br />necessary to fill in the gaps. Mr. Beets recommended that <br />staff simplify the ordinance so that it didn't repeat state <br />law, but adopted it by reference; and after revisions, Police <br />Chief Sletner could return to provide her field perspective <br />as to whether the proposed ordinance would be adequate. <br />Mr. Beets advised that staff had included statute language <br />within the body of the proposed ordinance to ease <br />residents' review rather than their need for comparison, <br />but noted that staff would provide a copy of state statute, <br />as an addendum to the proposed ordinance, for reference. <br />Councilmember Ihlan expressed her concern that the <br />Council not serve as an appeal board. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.