My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005_0411_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2005
>
2005_0411_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 11:47:05 AM
Creation date
9/14/2009 10:00:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
230
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Regular Meeting — 03/28/05 <br />DRAFT Minutes - Page 17 <br />clarification; pedestrian safety improvements related to the <br />contract; lack of Council interest in paying for road <br />reconstruction, given exchange of State Farm Road right- <br />of-way vacation; and policy issues related to rezoning the <br />area to a business park. <br />Councilmember Ihlan expressed her concern and <br />ramifications of going forward with rezoning of this parcel <br />and amending the Comprehensive Plan, and loss of design <br />control. Councilmember Ihlan sought Council <br />commitment to adhere to strict negotiations, on behalf of <br />the public's interest, for the public improvement contract. <br />Council concerns remaining included further pedestrian <br />safety improvements on County Road B and other areas; <br />and renegotiation of the frontage road reconstruction. <br />Councilmember Schroeder questioned the assessment <br />policy allotment (75%/25%) and opined his preference <br />that at a minimum, half be paid for by Target as it was of <br />the most benefit to them and their access. <br />Acting Mayor Maschka concurred regarding the cost of <br />the road reconstruction being borne by Target. <br />Staff was directed to renegotiate the road reconstruction <br />costs; bring the north wall elevations to the City Council <br />for further review; enhance pedestrian safety issues; and <br />return to the City Council at their April 11, 2005 regular <br />meeting with additional information as requested. <br />Public Comment <br />John Kysylyczyn, 3083 N Victoria Street <br />Mr. Kysylyczyn opined that this was not the original plan <br />brought before the City Council by Target in 2003; <br />therefore the assessment issue wasn't discussed, as Target <br />was proposing take over of several streets, with no City <br />cost responsibility requirement, thus the granting of the <br />easement by the City. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.