Laserfiche WebLink
� �~� ., , i ' � <br />EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE <br />CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Uk` ROSEVILLE <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of <br />Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota, was held on the 25th day of April, 2005, at 6:3(} p.m. <br />The following members were present: <br />and the following were absent: <br />Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION NO. <br />A RESOLUTION APPROVING A 25 FOOT LOT DEPTH VARIANCE <br />AND A 1,580 SQUARE FOOT LOT SIZE VARIANCE <br />TO SECTION 1004.016 (Resrc�eu�ia� DimensionalRequirements) <br />OF THE ROSEVILLE CITY CODE <br />FOR PRE-EXISTING PARCEL "B" FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT <br />1758 ALTA VISTA DRIVE <br />(PF 3626) <br />WHEREAS, Ralph and Jim Beauclaire have requested a 25 foot lot depth variance and a <br />1,580 square foot lot size variance to Section 1004.016 (Residential Dimensional Requirements) <br />of the Roseville City Code for a pre-existing Parcel " Bfor property located at 1758 Alta Vista <br />Drive, <br />WHEREAS, the pre-existingparcel " Blocated at 1758 Alta Vista Drive is legally <br />described as: <br />WHEREAS, Section 11.0404 E outlines the requirements and procedures to follow when <br />a subdivision of properties creates a total of three or less land parcels; and <br />WHEREAS, Section 1004.016 (Residential Dimensional Requirements) establishes the <br />minimum lot standards for residential parcels, which includes an 85 foot minimum width along a <br />public right-of-way, a 110 foot minimum depth and 11,000 square foot minimum size; and <br />WHEREAS, Section 1013 of the City Code grants the Variance Board authority to <br />reviewlapprave appropriate variances in accordancewith the Code requirements, and MS <br />462357, subd 6(s) provides authority for the city to hear and grant requests for variances under <br />certain circumstances: and <br />WHEREAS, On Apri16,2005, the Planning Commission held a hearing on the <br />Beauclaire variance and subdivision requests. One neighbor was present to support the <br />subdivision but to caution about the private sewer and pumping systems. He recommended a new <br />city sewer line as an alternative. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the <br />variances and subdivision 6-0 based on the findings in Section 5 of the proj ect report and subj ect <br />