Laserfiche WebLink
DP'W/Ti' <br />scription: <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />�n���.r ?� ��� <br />Notices (P�`3634) <br />� _f� TOPIC DESCRIPTION: <br />Date: 04125105 <br />Item No. 6. <br />ariance <br />L] The Variance Board has recommended a change to the Section 1014.04 B4 of the City Code <br />relating to official notice prior to Variance Board hearings. The Board and staffrecommend <br />one written notice to property owners within 350 feet. On the notice would be the time and <br />date of the hearing and the process �i time limits for appeals of the Variance Board <br />decisions. <br />1.? On April 6,2005, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this proposal. There <br />was no public comment. The Planning Commission recommended approval 6-0, with <br />clari�'y�ng language added to state that the appeal process will be explained on the mailed <br />notice. <br />I..} Current code requires the staff to send out individualizednotices before and after the <br />meeting. The "after meeting" notice explains the action taken by the Board and also explains <br />the appeal process. With the exception of the action, which can be found at the meeting, on <br />cable, and in minutes and on the web page, all mailed notice materials could be simplified <br />and reduced in expense with one "pre-meeting" mailing, 10 days in advance of the meeting. <br />�,Q RF.�'(��4����Na�TTC�V�; <br />?. I The Planning Commission, Variance Board and the staff recommend the change as a means <br />of simplification and reducing the cost and time of the notice process. <br />3,� SUGGESTED ACTION: <br />BY MOTION, approve of the text amendment. <br />Attachment: Proposed Amendment <br />:.��i. �_-� iya�lttyr.'Mi'�'��ut� �ifi�r�f �'�J7�'GFifi ly�l7 TiC'fV;Ftii i'�:.�Yti�fF�w � 1':T�F. ti'+fi��r ��vJS'ti�il'� } a3 <br />I�lotice_AmendmentlE�CA_Propased Changes to City Code (042505).doc <br />