2005_0425_Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

costs, which will include an estimate of market value and relocation benefits, attorney's fees and other professional fees and services. 3. At the time a court deposit or payment is required, the Redeveloper advances an amount equal to the greater of (i) ll0% of the estimated total acquisition costs, less the Redeveloper's initial deposit ar(ii) the amount of such deposit or payment. Conveyance to the Redeveloper will occur promptly after acquisition by the City. At the closing, the •- Redeveloper will pay or the City will refund the difference � between the actual condemnation costs and sums previously deposited by the Redeveloper. If the amount of the award or relocation payment is appealed, the Redeveloper will advance, at closing, ll 0% of the amount of the Respondent's claim plus the City's estimated costs of defending the appeal, less amounts previously deposited. 4. If the City is unable to acquire a parcel of property through the eminent domain process, *'�� '�*•: ^��' D°�°„°'��^�- and, if both parties agree that the elimination of such �arcel will +1��4iLi Leri l� I substantiallv im�air the inte�,xitY of the entire Proiect, the parties a�ree to discuss whether changes to the Concept Plan attached as Exhibit B can be made to accommodate the elimination of such parcel. Anv such changes shall be subject to the reasonable al�proval of City Council and the Redeveloper. Financial Unfeasibilitv: The Redevelo�ment Agreement will set forth a definition of financial "unfeasibilitv" which would apbiv in two circumstances: . 'L If the cost to acquire one or more of the parcels in Area 8 substantially exceeds the parties' �ti�,a�esprojections and renders the entire Project (not just the portion of the Project relating to Area 8) t�++-��fi i ie•�� f i r� i i i.i ii4 i{tl l� unfeasible. and if both parties agree that the elimination of such parcel will not substantiallv impair the integrity of the Project, the parties agree to discuss whether changes to the Conce�t Piax� can be made to accommodate the elimination of such parcel or narceIs. Such changes will be subject to the reasonable a�roval of the Ci�v and the Redeveloper. 2. If the cost of environmental remediation substantiall� exceeds the parties' projections and renders the entire Proiect financiallv unfeasible, the parties a�ree to discuss whether changes to the Conce�t Plan can be made in a way which will not substantially impair the inte�ritv of the Proiect. Such �