My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005_0613_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2005
>
2005_0613_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 8:55:29 AM
Creation date
9/14/2009 10:02:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
498
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-W DRAF�for Roseville city Council — <br />-���� Reading, June 13,2005 <br />3. Soft Dollar Costs <br />� The following shows an estimated dollar value to the community related to the themes <br />described earlier in the report. It is assumed that these city functions would have incurred <br />these costs if they were held in other facilities (if the RSC was not available). <br />Waived fees for Skating Center Banquetresidentusers $36,000 <br />Run/Aoii for the Roses, Tour de Roses $2,000 <br />Dr�alTeen Dance $2,000 <br />RosefestParade T-�osting $2,000 <br />City Special Events $2,000 <br />Recreation Program $1,000 <br />Total $45,000 <br />4. Public Usage Value <br />. The following table, "Cost of Recreation Occasion Metrics" is a list of subsidized Parks and <br />Recreation activities for which a cost-per-user could be calculated. There are many other <br />subsidized activities (such as the parks, pathways, and other such "unsupervised" facilities <br />and activities) which could not be calculated at this time, due to the inability to arrive at <br />accurate user counts. <br />Task Force requested Park and Recreation staff to develop a quantitative method to assess <br />recreational benefit <br />o Task Force understands that the scope of this request exceeds the timeframe of <br />completing this report <br />o Task Force views this table as the 15� cut of developing a quantitative model and is <br />encouraging the staff to further develop it for use beyond assessing the benefit <br />derived from the RSC Oval <br />• Observation: RSC Oval provides the highest number of annual recreation occasions and the <br />lowest cost per recreation occasion among other Roseville facilities listed. See Attachment <br />. Observation: If assumptions are accurate— there are 40,000 recreation occasions among <br />Roseville residents which at a$1 per recreation occasion cost, which equates to a"Public <br />Good" contribution of $40,000 <br />Page 24 of 29 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.