My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005_0613_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2005
>
2005_0613_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 8:55:29 AM
Creation date
9/14/2009 10:02:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
498
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Regular Meeting— OS/23/OS <br />DRAFT Minutes - Page 26 <br />Ramsey County, County Road C ReconstructionProject." <br />Councilmembers recognized the impacts to residents, but further <br />recognized the need to complete the project at everyone's earliest <br />convenience. <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Maschka; Kough; Ihlan; Schroeder and Klausing. <br />Nays: None. <br />9. Consider Adopting a Dangerous Animal Ordinance <br />Police Chief Carol Sletner, as addressed by Mayor Klausing, <br />noted that the proposed Ordinance language had been modified <br />to address "proper enclosure" defining requirements for both <br />dangerous animals and dangerous dogs. Chief Sletner noted that <br />the proposed amendments to Title Five, Section 401.16 of <br />Roseville City Code would allow for the registration and <br />regulation of animals that fall under the definition of vicious or <br />dangerous animals as defined in the proposed ordinance <br />contained in the staff report dated May 23, 2005. <br />Chief Sletner reviewed a recent incident with a dangerous animal <br />that was not able to be identified as such under current Code, and <br />was moved from the City's jurisdiction after repeated attacks to <br />pedestrians. <br />There was considerable discussion between staff and City <br />Council regarding various portions of the ordinance and <br />continuing lack of consensus regarding language; definitions; <br />paralleling State Statute; the need for such ordinance revisions; <br />minimum square footage for kennels and/or enclosures; <br />competency and qualification of staff or responsible parties in <br />determining dangerous and vicious animals; and confinement <br />areas. <br />Maschka moved, Klausing seconded, adoption of an ordinance <br />amending Title Five, Section 501.16, Vicious Animals, as <br />presented in the staff report dated May 23,2005. <br />Councilmember Maschka spoke in support of the motion; <br />opining that the current code language created a disaster waiting <br />to happen and was created by a few irresponsible pet owners <br />Dangerous Animal <br />Ordinance <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.