Laserfiche WebLink
Margaret Driscoll <br />From: <br />Sent: <br />To: <br />Subject: <br />Jay T. Squires [jsquires�a raiwik(aw.eam] <br />Thursday, June 02,2005 9:51 AM <br />Margaret Driscoll <br />FW: Your comments as documented in the minutes of 5/9/05 re: ballot referendum for Twin <br />Lakes <br />I have reviewed the minutes. They are not inconsistent with my recollection of my <br />comments. As I recall, a citizen (Mr. Hauk?} got up during the comment period and talked <br />about Twin Lakes. He suggested I had opined that there were no legal impediments to an <br />advisory election, so long as it was privately funded. The issue had first come up late on <br />the evening of the Town Hall meeting held at the school by Concordia Academy. I recalled <br />offering my off the cuff comment that the issue raised public purpose expenditure issues, <br />and that it was in the nature of initiative and referendum. When the citizen quoted me, I <br />clarified that I had not done any thorough research, and that there may well be other <br />impediments that needed to be reviewed. We conducted the research, and had the written <br />opinion for the Council the following Monday. <br />Given my above recollection of things, I believe the minutes accurately reflect the <br />discussion. <br />The information contained in this electronic message is attorney-client privileged and <br />confidential information and is intended only for the use of the indava.dua,�(s} to whom <br />this electronic message is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended <br />recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, <br />you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this electronic <br />communication or any attachment thereto is strictly prohibited. If you have received this <br />electronic communication in error, you should immediately return it to us and delete the <br />message from your system. Thank you. <br />>�> "Margaret Driscoll° <marga�et.drasca�l@ca.rosevS.11e.n�n.us> 06/02/05 <br />09: �OAM ?�•'- <br />� _____Original Message <br />> From: Margaret Driscoll <br />> Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 1:�.2 PM <br />> To: ' jtsqui�es@�atwa.kJ.aw, con�' <br />> Cc: Cindy Anderson <br />�• Subject: Your comments as documented in the minutes of 5/9/05 <br />re: <br />� ballot referendum for Twin Lakes <br />� Importance: High <br />� <br />. .�, -- <br />} _ <br />'� At the 5/23/05 City Council meeting Ihlan questioned the minutes of <br />r• May 9 regarding the ballot referendum for Twin Lakes: <br />:} Council Meeting of May 9, 2005 <br />r� Schroeder moved, Ihlan seconded, <br />:* Meeting as amended. <br />approval of the May 9, 2005 Regular <br />•� Corrections: <br />.* Page 2, 2nd paragraph; Public Comment, Richard Houck (Ihlan) <br />1 Staff was directed to review with City Attorney Squires the statement <br />s• he made and that statement as reflected in the minutes to determine <br />� its accuracy; and to revise the statement if warranted. <br />� Roll Call <br />s• Ayes: Kough; Thlan; Schroeder and Klausing. <br />r• Nays: None. <br />} Abstentions: Maschka. <br />