My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005_0620_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2005
>
2005_0620_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 11:57:55 AM
Creation date
9/14/2009 10:02:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
228
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Regular Meeting — 06/13/OS <br />DRAFT Minutes - Page 11 <br />the June 20, 2005 meeting; and questioned the probable success <br />of a bonding bill, opining other options within the City's own <br />budget may be more viable. <br />Councilmember Maschka advised Councilmembers that he had <br />been doing substantial research on this part of the project; <br />referencing the sample resolution to be considered later in the <br />meeting. Mr. Maschka reviewed the feedback he had received <br />related to periodic bonding, recommending a grouping of various <br />organizations for a one-time annual bonding bill. <br />Further discussion included sales tax and pursuit of foundation <br />dollars. <br />Mayor Klausing advised Chair Jacobson that the Task Force <br />report met the Council's expectations, and thanked everyone <br />involved on the Task Force, including those past elected officials <br />and citizens who have assisted with a historical perspective. <br />Mayor Klausing opined that the Task Force had provided an <br />excellent report and on behalf of the Council, staff and citizens, <br />expressed his appreciation for the quality of the report. <br />John Goedeke, 2674 Virginia Avenue <br />Mr. Goedeke expressed his appreciation to the Task Force; <br />however, cautioned that the City Council may want to carefully <br />pursue the state funding restrictions and legalities of fees for <br />non-residents and residents, given the original state funding <br />received by the City for construction of a re�ional facility. <br />Mr. Goedeke opined that, when the facility was first constructed, <br />an operational advisory group should have been an ongoing <br />group; and strongly encouraged the City Council to appoint such <br />a group now, specifically to pursue marketing of the facility. <br />Mr. Jacobson thanked the City Council for their time and <br />comments; noting they would return at the June 20, 2005 <br />meeting with the formal and final report; requesting the City <br />Council accept the final report and authorize staff to proceed <br />with implementing their recommendations. <br />� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.