My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005_0620_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2005
>
2005_0620_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 11:57:55 AM
Creation date
9/14/2009 10:02:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
228
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ATTACHMENT 15 <br />Task Force Meetin� Minutes <br />Discussion moved onto the Skate Park. Members talked about the specific <br />community group the skate park serves, many on the committee believe the City <br />cost for the skate park is minimal when compared to the benefit it is providing to <br />the community. Further dialogue included whether the city continues to operate <br />the park in the future as it does now, as a tier two facility. The industry trend <br />seems to be toward tier one facilities. Converting to a tier one facility would <br />result in lost revenues leading to the question of whether the lost revenues could <br />be generated in another manner, a contract provider of some sort. <br />7. Theme: Charitable Gambling — discussion led by Council Member Maschka <br />• Currently the Community Fund receives approximately $50,000 annually from <br />local charitable gaming. Over the years, Roseville has successfully �sed/managed <br />the endowment fund concept to create a fund that currently provides for a number <br />of community services <br />� Maschka outlined a possible scenario that would create a new endowment fund <br />for the OVAL. This endowment would receive a percentage of the annual gaming <br />funds that currently go to the community fund. The new endowment would <br />include a sunset to ensure a limited time period for growth and development. The <br />establishment of an endowment would support efforts by the Friends of the <br />OVAL to raise funds to support OVAL operations. <br />Theme: Philosophy of Roseville Contribution <br />Miller Briefed Task Force members on budgeting process and provided general overview <br />of a Philosophy of Roseville contribution. Anfang provided Task Force Members with a <br />draft document which outlined current "Cost per Recreation Occasions" for Roseville <br />Parks and Recreation Facilities and a sampling of supported recreation programs. <br />• Task Force recognized there is same local resentment toward the OVAL. <br />� Task Force talked about possibly finding a method to track user residency. Does <br />it make sense to charge a non-resident fee for public skating? Further discussion <br />revealed that tracking residency may cost more than the additional revenues <br />generated by increased user fees for non-residents. <br />� Task Force members agreed there is a reasonable level for the City to be <br />supporting the OVAL ... what is that level? If the Skating Center is a$1 million <br />dollar business and the City is running it a 10% deficit ($100,000 annual <br />contribution).. . what should the new strategy be? What percentage of financial <br />support is the City coi��fortable committing to? <br />• Is there a way to generate an additional $.25 from everyone that walks through the <br />doors ofthe Skating Center? <br />ATTACHMENT 15 <br />Task Force Meeting Minutes <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.